Abstract:Open research practices seek to enhance the transparency and reproducibility of research. While there is evidence of increased uptake in these practices, such as study preregistration and open data, facilitated by new infrastructure and policies, little research has assessed general uptake of such practices across psychology university researchers. The current study estimates psychologists' level of engagement in open research practices across universities in the United Kingdom and Ireland, while also assessing possible explanatory factors that may impact their engagement. Data were collected from 602 psychology researchers in the United Kingdom and Ireland on the extent to which they have implemented various practices (e.g., use of preprints, preregistration, open data, open materials). Here we present the summarized descriptive results, as well as considering differences between various categories of researcher (e.g., career stage, subdiscipline, methodology), and examining the relationship between researcher's practices and their self‐reported capability, opportunity, and motivation (COM‐B) to engage in open research practices. Results show that while there is considerable variability in engagement of open research practices, differences across career stage and subdiscipline of psychology are small by comparison. We observed consistent differences according to respondent's research methodology and based on the presence of institutional support for open research. COM‐B dimensions were collectively significant predictors of engagement in open research, with automatic motivation emerging as a consistently strong predictor. We discuss these findings, outline some of the challenges experienced in this study, and offer suggestions and recommendations for future research. Estimating the prevalence of responsible research practices is important to assess sustained behaviour change in research reform, tailor educational training initiatives, and to understand potential factors that might impact engagement.

Three steps to open science for qualitative research in psychology

Qualitative research at the crossroads of open science and big data: Ethical considerations

Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

Rethinking Transparency and Rigor from a Qualitative Open Science Perspective

Can psychology walk the walk of open science?

Demystifying Open Science in health psychology and behavioral medicine: a practical guide to Registered Reports and Data Notes

A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland

The time has come for psychology to stop treating qualitative data as an embarrassing secret

Open Accessibility in Education Research: Enhancing the Credibility, Equity, Impact, and Efficiency of Research

Open Science Practices by Early Career HCI Researchers: Perceptions, Challenges, and Benefits

Hits and misses in the last decade of open science: Researchers from different subfields and career stages offer personal reflections and suggestions

7 Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List

Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science

Open Science in Education Sciences

Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study

From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond

Open data, open review and open dialogue in making social sciences plausible

Publishing qualitative research in the Journal of Educational Psychology: Synthesizing research perspectives across methodological silos.

Implications of the open science era for educational psychology research syntheses

Promoting an open research culture