Ni2P/Al2O3-SAPO-11 Catalysts for Hydroprocessing of Methyl Palmitate: a Comparative Investigation of Synthesis Methods
I. V. Shamanaev,E. N. Vlasova,I. V. Yakovlev,A. Yu. Fedorov,V. P. Pakharukova,E. Yu. Gerasimov,G. A. Bukhtiyarova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s096554412406015x
IF: 1.258
2024-11-21
Petroleum Chemistry
Abstract:A series of Ni 2 P catalysts on an Al 2 O 3 -SAPO-11 composite support were synthesized by two different methods: reduction of Ni and P precursors by hydrogen at elevated temperatures ( TPR ); and phosphidation of supported Ni metallic particles by triphenylphosphine ( PPh3 ). For loading active components, aqueous solutions prepared from different precursors (specifically, Ni(OAc) 2 and (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 ; Ni(OH) 2 and H 3 PO 3 ; and Ni(OAc) 2 and H 3 PO 2 ) were used in the first case, and a Ni(OAc) 2 solution was used in the second. The catalysts were characterized by chemical analysis, H 2 -TPR, NH 3 -TPD, XRD, TEM, XPS, and 27 Al MAS NMR. The catalyst performance was tested in hydroprocessing of a model compound of fatty acid triglycerides, specifically methyl palmitate ( MP ). The formation of a Ni 2 P phase was confirmed by XRD, TEM, and XPS; moreover, the synthesis method was found to affect the localization of Ni 2 P nanoparticles. It was further revealed that, in the TPR method, the particles are predominantly located on the Al 2 O 3 surface, whereas the PPh3 method produces particles on the surfaces of both Al 2 O 3 and SAPO-11. The main MP conversion products are n - and iso -alkanes (C 15 and C 16 ). At 100% conversion of oxygenates, the PPh3-synthesized catalyst achieved a higher iso -alkane selectivity (63%) than the TPR-prepared samples (2–21%).
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical,chemistry, physical, petroleum, organic