The effect of response modality on witness statements when using the self-administered interview

João P. Gomes,Delfina Fernandes,Rui M. Paulo,Pedro B. Albuquerque,João P. GomesDelfina FernandesRui M. PauloPedro B. Albuquerquea School of Psychology,University of Minho,Braga,Portugalb School of Psychology,Liverpool John Moores University,Liverpool,UK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2313977
2024-04-09
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Abstract:The Self-Administered Interview (SAI © ) elicits comprehensive initial statements from witnesses and can enhance subsequent statements. However, the SAI © requires a written response that may have disadvantages compared to a spoken account. This study tested the effect of SAI © 's response modality and its subsequent impact on a delayed retrieval attempt. After watching a mock crime, participants completed a Spoken-SAI © , Typed-SAI © or no-SAI © . Four days later, participants read a news report with misleading post-event information (PEI) and, after another 3 days, completed a free recall and a recognition test. The Spoken-SAI © required less time to be completed than the Typed-SAI © but elicited accounts with a comparable amount of correct information and accuracy. Providing an initial account using the SAI © (vs. no-SAI © ) produced more detailed accounts 1 week later regardless of response modality but did not reduce the susceptibility to misleading PEI. This provides valuable insight for improving the SAI © and its applicability.
psychiatry,criminology & penology,law,psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?