Abstract:Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Ahead of Print. We sought to test the effects of sexual assault form and complainant/defendant gender on jurors' perceptions of the prototypicality of a sexual assault case, complainant, and defendant. We examined whether these perceived prototypicality measures predict mock jurors' complainant/defendant blame and credibility assessments and if these assessments predict verdict decisions in a simulated sexual assault trial. We predicted that the female complainant–male defendant condition, vaginal intercourse condition, and their combination would be perceived as more prototypical than their counterparts, which would predict blame/credibility assessments, ultimately predicting verdict. Mock jurors (N = 437) recruited via Prolific Academic read a trial transcript involving an alleged sexual assault (oral or vaginal sex forced onto the complainant) with a female complainant–male defendant or a male complainant–female defendant. They provided a verdict and assessed the perceived prototypicality of the case/complainant/defendant, provided blame/credibility assessments for the complainant/defendant, and responded to rape myth questionnaires. Sexual assault form did not significantly affect any of our outcomes. Mock jurors perceived the male complainant–female defendant condition as less prototypical of a sexual assault case/complainant/defendant than the female complainant–male defendant condition, resulting in negative evaluations of the complainant, favorable evaluations of the defendant, and lowered probability of conviction. Simultaneously, for fixed levels of prototypicality, the female complainant received more negative evaluations, and the male defendant received more favorable evaluations, which lowered the probability of conviction; mock jurors' rape myth acceptance moderated this effect. Rape myths were predictive of decision-making in cases involving a female complainant, and male rape myths were predictive in cases involving a male complainant. Results demonstrate that prototypicality is a mechanism behind mock jurors' decisions in sexual assault trials and elucidate the distinctive role of prototypes and rape myths on juror decision-making, with practical implications for the field of psychology and the criminal legal system.

The power of words: the impact of police interviewer's judgment error and apology on sexual violence victims in simulated interviews

Rejecting an intergroup apology attenuates perceived differences between victim and perpetrator groups in morality and power

' Are We Sure That He Knew That You Don't Want to Have Sex?': Discursive Constructions of the Suspect in Police Interviews with Rape Complainants

Sex offenders’ perceptions of the effectiveness and fairness of humanity, dominance, and displaying an understanding of cognitive distortions in police interviews: A vignette study

Within‐group apologies can restore a sense of justice more for non‐victimized observers than for victims

From parallel to intersecting narratives in cases of sexual assault

The Impact of Participation in Research About Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence: An Investigation of Harms, Benefits, and Regrets in Young Adolescents in the Western Cape of South Africa

The effect of response modality on witness statements when using the self-administered interview

Assessing the Impact of Media on Blaming the Victim of Acquaintance Rape

The Role of Defendant Gender and PTSD Diagnosis in a Battered Spouse Case

The Role of Complainant/Defendant Gender and Form of Sexual Assault on Jurors' Perceptions of Prototypicality and Verdicts

Stereotypes About Battered Women and Victim's Self-Defense: Legal Implications

When the Perpetrator is Found Not Guilty: Implications for the Treatment of Adolescent Sexual Assault Survivors

Assessment of the Standard Forensic Procedure for the Evaluation of Psychological Injury in Intimate-Partner Violence

Reducing Bias in Forensic Evaluations Describing Sexualized Violence

Mental health in the courtroom: how victim mental health status impacts juror decision-making in a rape case

How Do Third Parties Respond to Intimate Partner Violence? The Role of the Victim's Justification of Violence

The effect of confession evidence on conviction, and considering alternative scenarios as remedy in a sample of police officers

A Qualitative Analysis of Victims' Perceptions of Procedural Justice for Sexual Victimization

A Procedural Justice Theory Approach to Police Engagement with Victim-Survivors of Rape and Sexual Assault: Initial Findings of the ‘Project Bluestone’ Pilot Study

“Embarrassing and disgraceful”: technology-facilitated sexual violence and victim’s healing process