Abstract:Past research has shown that people are inconsistent when making predictions about emotions and moral behaviors following their own wrongdoing. However, it is less clear how people react when they did not cause the wrongdoing themselves but the group or collective they associate with. The present paper investigates people's reactions to collective wrongdoing and the question (1) whether the prediction of the experience of group‐based guilt is related to actual moral behaviors and (2) whether this prediction is reliable. In three studies, we analyze collective guilt and subsequent behavioral reactions. Study 1 involved real academic situations, varying the kind of unfair treatment of others. A priori, participants overestimated their own subsequent experiences of collective guilt as well as their moral behavior. With respect to actual responses, experienced guilt was the strongest predictor of behavioral reactions, while imagined guilt, in‐group identification and satisfaction did not significantly predict responses. Moreover, participants also reacted more to the direct harm caused by their group to others than to unjustified privileges granted to others. Study 2 fully replicated these results and showed relative stability in the predictions of collective guilt. Study 3 compared the responses by participants of the previous two studies with their responses 5 years later, indicating high stability of the observed effects over time. Also, we observed that making repeated predictions after experiencing the guilt‐eliciting situation did not improve the accuracy of our participants' predictions. We discuss the implications of these findings for self‐predictions, behavioral and affective forecasting of collective emotions, and for common assessment methods of guilt by hypothetical vignettes.

Within‐group apologies can restore a sense of justice more for non‐victimized observers than for victims

Rejecting an intergroup apology attenuates perceived differences between victim and perpetrator groups in morality and power

The power of words: the impact of police interviewer's judgment error and apology on sexual violence victims in simulated interviews

Fostering Social Cohesion in Post‐Conflict Societies: The Power of Normative Apologies in Reducing Competitive Victimhood and Enhancing Reconciliation and Intergroup Negotiation

From parallel to intersecting narratives in cases of sexual assault

Acknowledgment after mass violence: Effects on psychological well-being and intergroup relations

Keeping score: Past victimization reduces offenders' conciliatory sentiments for their present transgressions

Repairing damaged professional relationships with leader apologies: An examination of trust and forgiveness

Examining the Past Injustices Suffered by Those in Corrections and the General Public: A New Therapeutic Approach May Be Necessary

Volition Speaks Louder Than Action: Offender Atonement, Forgivability, and Victim Valuation in the Minds of Perceivers

What Is Wrong with Empirical-Legal Research into Victimhood? A Critical Analysis of the Ordered Apology and the Victim Impact Statement

Recent Trends in the Execution of Sentences and the Involvement of Victims in Japan

Leader Apology in the Employee–Organization Relationship: The Roles of Subordinate Power Distance Belief and Leader Competence

The Effect of Anticipatory Apology and Appreciation in Online Support-Seeking Messages on Support Provision in the US and Korea

Observer Reactions to Interpersonal Injustice: the Roles of Perpetrator Intent and Victim Perception

Threaten and affirm: The role of ingroup moral exemplars for promoting prosocial intergroup behavior through affirming moral identity

Predicting Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Collective Wrongdoing: Effects of Imagined Versus Experienced Collective Guilt on Moral Behavior

Has Probation Any Impact in Terms of Reparation to Victims and Communities? Complicating a Simple Question

Victims of the Itaewon crowd crush died twice: The role of justice beliefs (general vs. personal) and fatalism in predicting victim‐blaming

Forgiveness in the United States and China.

When the specter of the past haunts current groups: Psychological antecedents of historical blame.