Abstract:The problem of culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse (CLED) student underrepresentation in gifted programs demonstrates a need to examine systemic processes, including the building of systemic capacity at the district and school levels where policies for gifted programs are formed and implemented. To examine the effects of this process on one diverse district’s gifted identification and services, we conducted 10 focus group interviews with 61 participants including gifted coordinators, teacher leaders, and gifted facilitators in the middle of a district initiative aimed at improving equitable identification and services in its gifted program. Data were analyzed using the six-phase approach of Thematic Analysis, which included (1) familiarization, (2) coding, (3) searching for themes, (4) reviewing themes, (5) defining and naming themes, and then (6) writing our report. Three overarching themes emerged from the in-depth analysis: (1) building systemic capacity, (2) shifting conceptions of giftedness, and (3) equitable identification practices and inclusive programming. Findings indicated the importance of systemic capacity building in teachers for improved CLED student identification into gifted programs and services. Essentially, building systemic capacity and shifting conceptions of giftedness share a reciprocal relationship in leading to more equitable gifted identification practices and inclusive programming. Moreover, implementing flexible and nuanced policy that takes into consideration school climate and culture is critical to building systemic capacity while working toward goals of equity. Recommendations are provided for researchers and practitioners based on these major findings.

Equitable Access, Locale, Funding, and the Alignment to Performance Ratings in Texas Gifted Programs

Assessing the Influence of No Child Left Behind on Gifted Education Funding in Texas: A Descriptive Study

Promising Practices for Improving Identification of English Learners for Gifted and Talented Programs

A Content Analysis of Selected State Plans for Gifted and Talented Education

Assessment Practices and the Underrepresentation of Minority Students in Gifted and Talented Education

Building Systemic Capacity to Improve Identification and Services in Gifted Education: A Case Study of One District

Identifying and Serving Gifted and Talented Students: Are Identification and Services Connected?

Inequality at the Starting Line: Underrepresentation in Gifted Identification and Disparities in Early Achievement

What Happens After Nomination? Evaluating the Probability of Gifted Identification With the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking

Consequences of Implementing Curricular-Aligned Strategies for Identifying Rural Gifted Students

Gifted, Streamed and Mixed-Ability Programs for Gifted Students: Impact on Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement

Teachers' reported beliefs about giftedness among twice exceptional and culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse populations

District Leaders Focused on Systemic Equity in Identification and Services for Gifted Education: From Policy to Practice

Describing the Status of Programs for the Gifted

Predicting Reading Performance by Texas Student Demographics Characteristics: A Statewide Analysis

Who Gets Identified? The Consequences of Variability in Teacher Ratings and Combination Rules for Determining Eligibility for Gifted Services for Young Children

Accountability Texas-Style: The Progress and Learning of Urban Minority Students in a High-Stakes Testing Context

Concordance of Gifted Education Policy and Practices at the State, District, and Local Levels