Abstract:The problem of culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse (CLED) student underrepresentation in gifted programs demonstrates a need to examine systemic processes, including the building of systemic capacity at the district and school levels where policies for gifted programs are formed and implemented. To examine the effects of this process on one diverse district’s gifted identification and services, we conducted 10 focus group interviews with 61 participants including gifted coordinators, teacher leaders, and gifted facilitators in the middle of a district initiative aimed at improving equitable identification and services in its gifted program. Data were analyzed using the six-phase approach of Thematic Analysis, which included (1) familiarization, (2) coding, (3) searching for themes, (4) reviewing themes, (5) defining and naming themes, and then (6) writing our report. Three overarching themes emerged from the in-depth analysis: (1) building systemic capacity, (2) shifting conceptions of giftedness, and (3) equitable identification practices and inclusive programming. Findings indicated the importance of systemic capacity building in teachers for improved CLED student identification into gifted programs and services. Essentially, building systemic capacity and shifting conceptions of giftedness share a reciprocal relationship in leading to more equitable gifted identification practices and inclusive programming. Moreover, implementing flexible and nuanced policy that takes into consideration school climate and culture is critical to building systemic capacity while working toward goals of equity. Recommendations are provided for researchers and practitioners based on these major findings.

Assessment Practices and the Underrepresentation of Minority Students in Gifted and Talented Education

Selecting for Ethnically Diverse Children Who May Be Gifted Using Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices and Naglieri Nonverbal Abilities Test.

Inequality at the Starting Line: Underrepresentation in Gifted Identification and Disparities in Early Achievement

A Meta-Analysis of Gifted and Talented Identification Practices

Barriers to Underserved Students’ Participation in Gifted Programs and Possible Solutions

Finding the missing Einsteins: Expanding the breadth of cognitive and noncognitive measures used in academic services

Fourth-Grade Teachers' Perceptions of Giftedness: Implications for Identifying and Serving Diverse Gifted Students

Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education

Equitable Access, Locale, Funding, and the Alignment to Performance Ratings in Texas Gifted Programs

Promising Practices for Improving Identification of English Learners for Gifted and Talented Programs

Lessons from the Field: Examining the Challenges and Successes of a Mathematics and Science Program Using Acceleration and Enrichment for Gifted Urban Middle School Students

Gifted Ethnic Minority Students and Academic Achievement

Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Programs: Optimal Learning Environments for Talented Minorities?

Identifying Exceptional Talent in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Increasing Diversity and Assessing Creative Problem-Solving

Building Systemic Capacity to Improve Identification and Services in Gifted Education: A Case Study of One District

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

What Happens After Nomination? Evaluating the Probability of Gifted Identification With the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking

Underachievement Among Spatially Gifted Students

Eight Universal Truths of Identifying Students for Advanced Academic Interventions