Eight Universal Truths of Identifying Students for Advanced Academic Interventions

Lindsay Ellis Lee,Jessica K. Ottwein,Scott J. Peters
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003236610-7
2021-09-03
Abstract:Gifted and talented educational programs have long suffered from problems of alignment despite recognition that such alignment is critical to the success of and rationale for gifted services. Matthews and Foster conceptualized gifted education as a means to provide students the optimal “educational match” between exceptional learning needs and the facilitated curriculum. Surface-level conceptual alignment is the first place to start—making sure that a compacted math program is provided to those students who have mastered the prerequisite skills in math that are necessary for success. Universal consideration results in fewer students missed, but with a higher chance that there will be students mistakenly identified for programming. The effect was a dramatic increase in both the accuracy of the identification system and the population of students from African American and Latinx families identified as gifted. The larger the percentage of students a district formally evaluates for gifted program eligibility, the fewer it will miss.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?