Abstract:As the validity issue of teacher nominations for the identification of gifted students has been raised recently, this study purports to test the validity of teacher nominations for selecting scientifically gifted students. As the criterion variables, domain specific traits such as science creative problem solving skills and science attitudes and domain general characteristics such as divergent thinking skills, creative attitudes, intrinsic motivation, and leadership were analyzed. Scientifically gifted students, potentially gifted students who had never been enrolled in gifted programs but were nominated as the scientifically gifted by teachers, and general class students participated in the study. The results of ANOVA showed that there were significant differences in all variables but originality factors of the TTCT and science creative problem solving skill test between gifted/nominated students and general class students; gifted/nominated students were significantly superior in these variables to general class students. The discriminant functions analysis yielded a discriminant function that significantly discriminated between gifted/nominated and general class students. Variables loaded on the discriminant function were science creative problem solving skills except for the originality subfactor, and science efficacy. These results imply that while teachers are likely to consider adaptation-oriented academic excellency related to logical thinking skills, problem solving skills, and science performance when nominating students, they may ignore the innovation-oriented property which is indicated as the fluency and originality factors of TTCT. Also, the criteria of teacher nominations are presumed to be congruent with the selection criteria of the gifted education program which pursued academic excellency as the educational goal. This suggests that with such criteria, high performing students in the science area can be sufficiently identified by teachers with no further identification procedures or/and tests.

Who Gets Identified? The Consequences of Variability in Teacher Ratings and Combination Rules for Determining Eligibility for Gifted Services for Young Children

Identifying and Serving Gifted and Talented Students: Are Identification and Services Connected?

Consequences of Implementing Curricular-Aligned Strategies for Identifying Rural Gifted Students

A Meta-Analysis of Gifted and Talented Identification Practices

What Happens After Nomination? Evaluating the Probability of Gifted Identification With the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking

The Validity of Teacher Nominations for the Selection of Scientifically Gifted Students

Fourth-Grade Teachers' Perceptions of Giftedness: Implications for Identifying and Serving Diverse Gifted Students

National Survey of Identification Practices in Gifted and Talented Education

Inequality at the Starting Line: Underrepresentation in Gifted Identification and Disparities in Early Achievement

The Impact of the Nomination Stage on Gifted Program Identification

Effective Identification Through Multiple Criteria

Eight Universal Truths of Identifying Students for Advanced Academic Interventions

The Effect of Training in Gifted Education on Elementary Classroom Teachers' Theory-Based Reasoning about the Concept of Giftedness

The relation between nominations and traditional measures in the gifted identification process: A meta-analysis

Consistency of the Performance and Nonperformance Methods in Gifted Identification

What Predicts Teachers' Attitudes Toward the Gifted?

Identifying emotional and behavioral risk among gifted and nongifted children: A multi-gate, multi-informant approach.

Invisible Bias in Nominating and Selecting Gifted Students