Abstract:Case studies have long been used to research and illuminate the lives of gifted students. One example is the longitudinal study of profoundly gifted students by the first author elaborating the impact of acceleration, non-acceleration, and ability grouping on gifted students academically, socially, and emotionally. In this chapter an overview of ability grouping and acceleration for academically gifted high school students in Australia in relation to their self-esteem will be reiterated. Specifically, a study will be discussed that examined the effects of three interventions: (1) ability grouping, (2) acceleration, and (3) acceleration used concurrently with ability grouping, on the self-esteem of academically gifted high school students. Self-esteem was assessed on three occasions during the school year with three groups of academically gifted Australian students undertaking their first year of secondary school (Year 7): (a) students in comprehensive schools (mixed-ability settings); (b) students in selective high schools (full-time ability grouping in schools serving only gifted students); and (c) students in selective high schools who were also collapsing Years 7 and 8 into a single year—a blend of ability grouping and acceleration. Students in the first two groups experienced a diminution (but not a serious drop) in self-esteem, probably associated with the drop-in status from being the most senior students in a (relatively) small primary school to being one of the youngest students in a school that could be several times larger. By contrast, students in the third group, which was not only experiencing the shift from primary to secondary school status but also telescoping the first two high school years into one, experienced only a modest dip in self-esteem. Their scores started off high and remained high. Some teachers in the schools employing the blend of acceleration and grouping expressed their concern that the use of two treatments rather than one might be ‘a bridge too far’. It does not seem to have been. Rather it seems to be an effective mode of blending two interventions whose effectiveness for supporting gifted students’ self-esteem is already acknowledged. Implications for research and practice that links with current research will be elaborated.

Gifted, Streamed and Mixed-Ability Programs for Gifted Students: Impact on Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement

Put Them Together and See How They Learn! Ability Grouping and Acceleration Effects on the Self-Esteem of Academically Gifted High School Students

Gifted Ethnic Minority Students and Academic Achievement

Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students.

Exceptionally Gifted Children: Long-Term Outcomes of Academic Acceleration and Nonacceleration

The Effectiveness of Current Interventions to Reverse the Underachievement of Gifted Students: Findings of a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Grade and Gender Differences in Gifted Students' Self-Concepts

A study of self‐concept and social support in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth grade gifted students

Gifted Students’ Perceptions of Gifted Programs: An Inquiry Into Their Academic and Social-Emotional Functioning

What Happens After Nomination? Evaluating the Probability of Gifted Identification With the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking

A Complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students

Development and Evaluation of a Pioneer School-Based Gifted Education Program (Project GIFT) for Primary and Secondary Students in Hong Kong

Underachievement Among Spatially Gifted Students

Gifted Secondary School Students

On Being Gifted, but Sad and Misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong Youth Study

Selecting for Ethnically Diverse Children Who May Be Gifted Using Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices and Naglieri Nonverbal Abilities Test.

The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect for Academic Self-Concept, Test Anxiety, and School Grades in Gifted Children.

Equally cursed and blessed: Do gifted and talented children experience poorer mental health and psychological well-being?

Equitable Access, Locale, Funding, and the Alignment to Performance Ratings in Texas Gifted Programs