Abstract:In Assumption 1, the function can be defined on the whole space , rather than on certain compact set . Hence, Assumption 1 is restated below. Assumption 1.For each , there exist an integer and an odd locally Lipschitz function such that In Remark 2, it cannot be concluded that the function is globally Lipschitz under Assumption 1. However, a globally Lipschitz function verifying Assumption 1 can be defined. Remark 2 is restated below. Remark 2.Assumption 1 is a standard one also needed in [3]. For each , let , and for , and define . Since is smooth and the set is compact, the set is a compact subset of . As in [2], let be a locally Lipschitz function of compact support such that for and for with being a compact superset of . It can be verified that there exists a real number such that for all . Noting that, for all , we have . The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. This work is substantially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61403117, 61174186, 61374158, 61573126, 61374030, 61533012), Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M602005), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2014HGQC0013).

Comment on Choi, M.G. Computing the Closest Approach Distance of Two Ellipsoids. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1302

Calibration Method for High Accuracy Measurement of Long Focal Length with Talbot Interferometry: Reply

Arbitrarily Elliptical–cylindrical Invisible Cloaking

Erratum: Dynamics of the Bounds of Squared Concurrence [phys. Rev. A 79, 032306 (2009)]

Corrigendum to Example 4 in “Μ-Bases for Complex Rational Curves” [computer Aided Geometric Design 30 (2013), 623–635]

Corrigendum to “A conservative linear difference scheme for the 2D regularized long-wave equation” [Appl. Math. Comput. 342 (2019) 55–70]

Computing The Minimum Distance Between Two Ellipsoids

Comment on "Conjectures on exact solution of three-dimensional (3D) simple orthorhombic Ising lattices" [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0705.1045" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1045">arXiv:0705.1045</a>]

Corrigendum to ‘robust Approach for Attitude Tracking and Nonlinear Disturbance Rejection of Rigid Body Spacecraft’ [IET Control Theory & Applications, 2016, 10 , (17), Pp. 2325–2330]

Erratum To: Strong Gravitational Lensing in the Einstein-Proca Theory

Comment on "focusing of High Polarization Order Axially-Symmetric Polarized Beams" [chin. Opt. Lett. 7, 938 (2009)]

Corrigendum To: “acceleration of a Two-Grid Method for Eigenvalue Problems”

Erratum: “an Accurate Analytic Mass Model for Lensing Galaxies” (2020, ApJ, 892, 62)

Asymmetric Conical Diffraction in Dislocated Edge-Centered Square Lattices.

Corrigendum to the paper, "A new iteration process for approximation of common fixed points for finite families of total asymtotically nonexpansive mappings". Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. vol. 2009, doi:10.1155/2009/615107

Learning-based correction with Gaussian constraints for ghost imaging through dynamic scattering media: erratum

Corrigendum for the article ''Curved Koszul duality theory''

Corrigendum to "Correspondence imaging through complex scattering media with temporal correction" optics and lasers in engineering, volume 174 (2024) 107957

DIFFERENTIATING THE STOCHASTIC ENTROPY IN NEGATIVELY CURVED SPACES UNDER CONFORMAL CHANGES (vol 67, pg 1115, 2017)

Correction: Bychkov et al. The σ− Cohomology Analysis for Symmetric Higher-Spin Fields. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1498

Revisiting the computation of the critical points of the Keplerian distance