Abstract:This paper investigates gender discrimination and its underlying drivers on a prominent Chinese online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platform. While existing studies on P2P lending focus on disparate treatment (DT), DT narrowly recognizes direct discrimination and overlooks indirect and proxy discrimination, providing an incomplete picture. In this work, we measure a broadened discrimination notion called disparate impact (DI), which encompasses any disparity in the loan's funding rate that does not commensurate with the actual return rate. We develop a two-stage predictor substitution approach to estimate DI from observational data. Our findings reveal (i) female borrowers, given identical actual return rates, are 3.97% more likely to receive funding, (ii) at least 37.1% of this DI favoring female is indirect or proxy discrimination, and (iii) DT indeed underestimates the overall female favoritism by 44.6%. However, we also identify the overall female favoritism can be explained by one specific discrimination driver, rational statistical discrimination, wherein investors accurately predict the expected return rate from imperfect observations. Furthermore, female borrowers still require 2% higher expected return rate to secure funding, indicating another driver taste-based discrimination co-exists and is against female. These results altogether tell a cautionary tale: on one hand, P2P lending provides a valuable alternative credit market where the affirmative action to support female naturally emerges from the rational crowd; on the other hand, while the overall discrimination effect (both in terms of DI or DT) favors female, concerning taste-based discrimination can persist and can be obscured by other co-existing discrimination drivers, such as statistical discrimination.

Discrimination in the Venture Capital Industry: Evidence from Field Experiments

Do Venture Capitalists Play A Monitoring Role in an Emerging Market? Evidence from the Pay-Performance Relationship of Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms

Gender, Race, and Entrepreneurship: A Randomized Field Experiment on Venture Capitalists and Angels

Investors Embrace Gender Diversity, Not Female CEOs: The Role of Gender in Startup Fundraising

Prejudice, Does It Exist or Not? Consumer Price Discrimination in Minority Entrepreneurship

Does Venture Capital Spur Innovation or the Other Way Around? Evidence on the Significance of Investment Timing from China

Lowering the Playing Field: Discrimination through Sequential Spillover Effects

Disparity and Discrimination in Consumer Credit Markets: Evidence from Online Peer-to-peer Lending

Diversity and inclusion: Evidence from corporate inventors

Reducing Discrimination with Reviews in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Field Experiments on Airbnb

Discrimination and Constraints: Evidence from The Voice

Gender Animus Can Still Exist Under Favorable Disparate Impact: a Cautionary Tale from Online P2P Lending

Are Investors Biased Against Women? Analyzing How Gender Affects Startup Funding in Europe

Architectures of Virtual Decision-Making: The Emergence of Gender Discrimination on a Crowdfunding Website

How Does Human Capital Matter? Evidence from Venture Capital

Does Workplace Discrimination Impede Innovation

LinkedOut? A Field Experiment on Discrimination in Job Network Formation

Marriage of Unequals? Investment Quality Heterogeneity, Market Heat, and the Formation of Status-Asymmetric Ties in the Venture Capital Industry

Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from 19,130 Resumes in China

Physical attractiveness, same-sex stimuli, and male venture capitalists' financial risk-taking

Does a VC’s Commitment Lead to Improved Investment Outcomes? Evidence From Climate Startups