Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Many corporations in the United States have enacted nondiscrimination policies for their LGBT employees, despite that the LGBT community has not been a legally protected class concerning employment discrimination at the national level. We examined whether progressive corporate LGBT-related policies may be an extension of policies and practices designed to foster diversity and create equality for existing legally protected classes (women, ethnic minorities, veterans, and those with disabilities). We also examined whether leadership level diversity (percentage of women and ethnic minorities on company boards of directors) predicted nondiscrimination policies for LGBT employees.HYPOTHESES: We predicted companies that have been recognized and awarded for protected class diversity policies and that have a greater percentage of women and racial/ethnic minorities on their boards of directors would have more progressive LGBT-related corporate policies.METHOD: Using a sample of Fortune 500 companies, we examined protected-class diversity awards and percentage of women and racial/ethnic minorities on boards of directors as predictors of LGBT-related policies. At the company-level, we controlled for the average age of board, company size, and company revenue. At the level of company headquarter location, we controlled for political climate, Christian religiosity, and LGBT employment nondiscrimination laws. We also controlled for U.S. region and industry sector.RESULTS: Multilevel modeling results indicated that protected-class diversity awards and the percentage of women on company boards of directors significantly and independently predicted progressive LGBT policy scores, whereas the percentage of racial/ethnic minorities on boards of directors had less consistent results.CONCLUSION: Companies that address issues of diversity and equality in the workplace have been likely to include the LGBT community among their groups of concern, even in the absence of legal pressures to do so. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Does Workplace Discrimination Impede Innovation

Does Workforce Diversity Pay? Evidence from Corporate Innovation

Do LGBT Workplace Diversity Policies Create Value for Firms?

Is Innovativeness Gender-Neutral? A Configurational Analysis of the Owners of High-tech New Ventures

It’s more complicated than we think: The implications of social capital on innovation

The Impact of Technology Identification Policy on Firm Innovation: Evidence from China

Pay Discrimination and Innovation Productivity: Evidence from the Passage of State-Level Pay Secrecy Laws

The Real Effect of Smoking Bans: Evidence from Corporate Innovation

Human Capital Inflow, Firm Innovation and Patent Mix

Diversity and inclusion: Evidence from corporate inventors

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Innovation: Evidence from Patent Filings and Citations in China

Mandated gender-diversity policy and firm innovation

Does Pay Injustice Impede Corporate Innovation? Evidence from Pay-Performance Sensitivity

High-Impact Innovations and Hidden Gender Disparities in Inventor-Evaluator Networks

LGBT workplace protections as an extension of the protected class framework.

Does Female Labor Scarcity Encourage Innovation?: Evidence from China's Gender Imbalance

Workplace diversity and innovation performance: current state of affairs and future directions

The impact of employee welfare on innovation performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing corporations

Impact of Pay Gap on Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Diversity

Are anti-dumping investigations against China ineffective in curbing innovation? Evidence from firms' patent filings

From Equality to Excellence: Exploring the Relationship between Gender Equality HR Policies and R&D Intensity