The impact of employee welfare on innovation performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing corporations

Yu Wei,Haoxi Nan,Guiwu Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107753
IF: 11.251
2020-10-01
International Journal of Production Economics
Abstract:<p>A large amount of literature has addressed the significant effects of some internal and external factors on corporate innovation performance. However, no research in the field of production economics focuses on the plausible impact of employee welfare on innovation performance of manufacturing corporations. Using a large sample data from Chinese listed manufacturing corporations over the period of 2010–2017, this study investigates whether and how employee welfare affects corporate innovation performance. We find that manufacturing corporations with higher employee welfare have better innovation performances measured by three categories of patent applications and this positive relationship is mainly reflected in the level of quality of innovation but not in the quantity of it. Then, various robustness checks further show that our results are not biased by alternative measures of innovation performance or employee welfare through different regression methods. In addition, the channel tests show that the positive impacts of employee welfare on innovation performances in China's manufacturing corporations are mainly achieved by retaining outstanding employees, attracting positive media reports and increasing inventor (R&amp;D) efficiency. Finally, we test the validity of three impact channels by using mediating effect analysis and further confirm our conclusions.</p>
engineering, manufacturing, industrial,operations research & management science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the impact of employee welfare on the innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises. The core issue of the study is to investigate whether and how employee welfare affects the innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises. The main contributions of the paper are as follows: 1. **Filling the Research Gap**: Existing literature mainly focuses on the relationship between macro-level or firm-level factors and innovation performance, with less attention on how employee welfare promotes corporate innovation, especially in the manufacturing sector. This paper provides empirical evidence showing that good employee welfare can help companies retain talent, attract positive media coverage, and improve the work efficiency of R&D personnel, thereby enhancing the company's innovation capability. 2. **Distinguishing Innovation Quality and Quantity**: The study finds that employee welfare mainly improves the quality of innovation (such as the number of invention patents) rather than the quantity of innovation (such as non-invention patents). This is crucial for corporate managers as they need to formulate strategies to enhance the core innovation capabilities of the company. 3. **Constructing a New Method for Employee Welfare Index**: Previous studies typically rely on the ASSET4 or KLD databases to measure employee welfare, but these databases have limitations in this study. Therefore, this study is the first to use the China Listed Company Social Responsibility Report Database (CHSRR) to establish an employee welfare index, providing a more suitable data source for Chinese listed manufacturing companies. 4. **Multiple Methods to Ensure Robustness of Conclusions**: To ensure the reliability of the research results, the authors used multiple statistical methods for analysis, including but not limited to different employee welfare measurement methods, Heckman two-step regression, instrumental variable method, etc. Additionally, a mediation effect analysis was conducted to verify through which channels employee welfare affects corporate innovation output. In summary, this paper provides theoretical support and empirical evidence for understanding how employee welfare promotes corporate innovation through the analysis of data from a large number of Chinese listed manufacturing companies. This has significant economic implications for policymakers and corporate management.