Internal pay gap, the social capital of TMT and enterprise ambidextrous innovation
PAN Zicheng,YI Zhigao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2023.03.003
2023-01-01
Abstract:In the era of the digital economy,an important measure to upgrade a firm′s comparative advantage and give impetus to industrial transformation and upgrading is enterprise innovation.However,as the innovation activity is featured by high risks and uncertainty,how to push participants to engage in innovation activities actively has generated a great deal of attention in the extant literature.Many studies indicate that both the management groups and ordinary employees play important roles in innovation activities,and their compensation contract is closely related to them.Meanwhile,the intra-firm pay gap containing executive and employee compensation incentives is important in the compensation contract.Its impact on enterprise innovation cannot be ignored.This leads us to reflect on the association between the internal pay gap and enterprise innovation.Actually,the academic literature on the impact of the internal pay gap on innovation activities is proliferating,but there is no consensus on the research conclusions.Based on the tournament theory,some scholars deem that the internal pay gap can mobilize the enthusiasm of competitors and simulates their risk-taking behaviors,thus driving enterprise innovation.Based on the behavior theory,some other scholars argue that large differences between the pay of executives and employees are easy to cause feelings of inequity,spawn destructive behaviors,and thus implement enterprise innovation.We hold that the failure to distinguish innovation activities effectively is an important reason for conflicting predictions on the above relationship.According to the differences in the innovation mode,enterprise innovation activities can be divided into exploitative and exploratory innovation,namely ambidextrous innovation.With the advent of the digital economy era,a single innovation model can no longer meet the needs of the sustainable development of enterprises.For example,the fall of giant enterprises such as Kodak,Nokia,and Giant Group has proved the unsustainability of a single innovation mode.So,the importance of ambidextrous innovation is evident.Unfortunately,most of the literature cited above assumes that different innovation models possess the same or similar uncertainty and objectives.The homogeneity assumption is apparently inconsistent with the realistic situation,especially unsuitable for the Chinese market,which is in urgent need of industrial transformation and upgrading by virtue of different innovation modes.This paper aims to shed further light on whether and how the internal pay gap affects the ambidextrous innovation of enterprises.Based on the sample data of non-financial listed companies from 2007 to 2017,we employ the OLS regression model to conduct empirical analyses after controlling for other factors that affect innovation.First,our tests indicate that the internal pay gap is positively associated with exploitative innovation but has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the exploratory innovation.Taking the average pay gap in the same industry as an instrumental variable,the results from the second-stage regression in our 2SLS analysis confirm the robustness of our findings.Second,our tests reveal that the social capital of TMT negatively moderates the internal relationship between the pay gap and ambidextrous innovation.Third,we also investigate how the strategic decision toward balancing ambidextrous innovation is affected by the internal pay gap.That is,when the internal pay gap is high,it is beneficial for the enterprise to choose the ambidexterity mode;otherwise,it is beneficial to choose the punctuated equilibrium model.Finally,a heterogeneity study finds that the relationship between internal the pay gap and enterprise ambidextrous innovation will vary by the digital economy level of different regions and property nature.In other words,the above relationship is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and areas with a low development level of the digital economy.This conclusion provides clear theoretical and practical implications.（1） In this study,we divide enterprise innovation into exploitative and exploratory innovations and investigate the influence of the internal pay gap on the two innovation activities.This work not only reconciles the debate on these positive and negative effects of the intra-firm pay gap on innovation activities,but also contributes to the nascent literature on the pay gap and ambidextrous innovation.（2） Our article is novel in that we develop a theoretical framework that allows us to examine how the enterprise ambidextrous innovation is influenced by the internal pay gap,based on tournament theory and behavioral theory.Meanwhile,we also discuss when and how the two theories play a leading role in different phases.These results contribute to painting a clearer picture concerning the overall relationship between the internal pay gap and innovation.（3） The practical implication of our findings is that pay incentive systems carefully designed to influence managers and ordinary employees′ actions can influence ambidextrous innovation activities.Our conclusions provide a reference for enterprises on how to design the pay gap to make a trade-off between justice and efficiency and bring new inspirations for enterprises on how to nurse the ambidextrous innovation and balance exploration and exploitation in innovations.