Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Many corporations in the United States have enacted nondiscrimination policies for their LGBT employees, despite that the LGBT community has not been a legally protected class concerning employment discrimination at the national level. We examined whether progressive corporate LGBT-related policies may be an extension of policies and practices designed to foster diversity and create equality for existing legally protected classes (women, ethnic minorities, veterans, and those with disabilities). We also examined whether leadership level diversity (percentage of women and ethnic minorities on company boards of directors) predicted nondiscrimination policies for LGBT employees.HYPOTHESES: We predicted companies that have been recognized and awarded for protected class diversity policies and that have a greater percentage of women and racial/ethnic minorities on their boards of directors would have more progressive LGBT-related corporate policies.METHOD: Using a sample of Fortune 500 companies, we examined protected-class diversity awards and percentage of women and racial/ethnic minorities on boards of directors as predictors of LGBT-related policies. At the company-level, we controlled for the average age of board, company size, and company revenue. At the level of company headquarter location, we controlled for political climate, Christian religiosity, and LGBT employment nondiscrimination laws. We also controlled for U.S. region and industry sector.RESULTS: Multilevel modeling results indicated that protected-class diversity awards and the percentage of women on company boards of directors significantly and independently predicted progressive LGBT policy scores, whereas the percentage of racial/ethnic minorities on boards of directors had less consistent results.CONCLUSION: Companies that address issues of diversity and equality in the workplace have been likely to include the LGBT community among their groups of concern, even in the absence of legal pressures to do so. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Do LGBT Workplace Diversity Policies Create Value for Firms?

Do LGBT-supportive corporate policies enhance firm performance?

Does Workplace Discrimination Impede Innovation

Does Workforce Diversity Pay? Evidence from Corporate Innovation

LGBT workplace protections as an extension of the protected class framework.

Corporate Sexual Equality and Firm Performance

Gender diversity and firm performance: when diversity at middle management and staff levels matter

From Equality to Excellence: Exploring the Relationship between Gender Equality HR Policies and R&D Intensity

Does Religiosity and LGBTQ Inclusiveness ImpactThe Probability of Financial Statement Manipulation?

Innovation As a Differentiation Strategy: Its Differential Substitution Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility

Improving the wellbeing of LGBTQ+ employees: Do workplace diversity training and ally networks make a difference?

Workplace diversity and innovation performance: current state of affairs and future directions

Do workforce diversity, inclusion practices, & organizational characteristics contribute to organizational innovation? Evidence from the U.A.E

Mandated gender-diversity policy and firm innovation

The role of top management team diversity in shaping the performance of business model innovation: a threshold effect.

Pay Discrimination and Innovation Productivity: Evidence from the Passage of State-Level Pay Secrecy Laws

“NO RETRIBUTION FOR BEING GAY?”: INEQUALITY IN GAY-FRIENDLY WORKPLACES

A Contingency Approach to HRM and Firm Innovation: the Role of National Cultures

Organizational inclusion and sustainable development: An empirical evidence from the context of Eastern culture

Integrating corporate social responsibility criteria into executive compensation and firm innovation: International evidence

Corporate responsibility towards employees and innovation: Evidence from an emerging market