Abstract:Global trends increasingly appear to be legitimizing same-gender relationships, yet international research shows that despite statutory rights to marry-and by extension, adopt children-same-gender couples continue to experience difficulties when trying to adopt. Primary among these barriers are the persistent heteronormative beliefs, which strongly underpin the unfounded myths about parenting abilities of same-gender couples. Such biased beliefs are perpetuated by some adoption professionals who oppose placing children with lesbian or gay couples. In 2013, New Zealand passed the Marriage Equality Act, making it possible for same-gender couples to legally marry-and by extension, adopt. This provided an opportunity to investigate the perceptions of New Zealand professionals about children being placed with same-gender couples, in a country often perceived to be more tolerant of LGBT people. New Zealand social workers and lawyers (an under-studied group)-the professions most likely involved in adoption-were recruited via professional bodies. Because studying perceptions and beliefs on socially sensitive topics are highly susceptible to social desirability, we designed an instrument utilizing multiple methods to assess and corroborate participants' views about placing children for adoption with couples of the same gender. Administered online and anonymously, the survey included demographic questions, evaluation of negative-meaning and positive-meaning statements, and used a scenario describing a prospective adoptive couple whose gender was ambiguous, in the context of adopting children of varying needs. Overall, the study found that while New Zealand lawyers and social workers (N = 314) had generally favorable views of gay and lesbian adoption, they still reported a preference to see children adopted by heterosexual couples over same-gender couples, within which lesbian and gay couples were preferred equally. Moreover, being religious and politically conservative were characteristics associated with more negative views toward placing children with same-gender couples. We conclude that, despite winning the rights to marry (and adopt as couples), such legislative wins might be merely the first hurdle to be overcome; normalizing same-gender parenting is what needs to happen next. Our study adds to the research focused on adoption professionals in various countries, with the ultimate aim to inform practices and policies supportive of families headed by same-gender couples and formed through adoption.

“NO RETRIBUTION FOR BEING GAY?”: INEQUALITY IN GAY-FRIENDLY WORKPLACES

The Perceptions of New Zealand Lawyers and Social Workers About Children Being Adopted by Gay Couples and Lesbian Couples

A Ten-Year Systematic Review

Workplace Incivility as Modern Sexual Prejudice

LGBT workplace protections as an extension of the protected class framework.

Beyond Tolerance: Policies, Practices, and Ideologies of Queer-Friendly Workplaces

Workplace-Sexual-Harassment Victimization and Employee Wellbeing Among LGBTQ+ and Non-LGBTQ+ Employees

Finding Work in the Age of LGBTQ + Equalities: Labor Market Experiences of Queer and Trans Workers in Deindustrializing Cities

Perceiving Discrimination: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation in the Legal Workplace

Do LGBT-supportive corporate policies enhance firm performance?

Contextual Prejudice: How Occupational Context and Stereotypes Shape Bias against Gay and Lesbian Employees

Associations between workplace characteristics and ‘outness’ in LGBTI workers in Austria

THE INVISIBLE MINORITY: DISCRIMINATION AGAINST BISEXUALS IN THE WORKPLACE

Effect of State and Local Sexual Orientation Anti-Discrimination Laws on Labor Market Differentials

A Retrospective Study of Sexual Minority Women's Gendered Sexuality: Butch and Femme Sex at the Turn of the 21st Century

"I Don't Even Want to Come Out": the Suppressed Voices of Our Future and Opening the Lid on Sexual and Gender Minority Youth Workplace Discrimination in Europe: a Qualitative Study

Improving the wellbeing of LGBTQ+ employees: Do workplace diversity training and ally networks make a difference?

Equal Work for All: The Lived Experiences of the Marginalized Workers on the Diversity and Inclusion Approach of Business Establishments

Workplace experiences of LGBTQIA+ trainees, staff, and faculty in academic psychology, psychiatry, and neuroscience departments

An Exploration of Lived Experiences of Sexually and Gender Diverse Staff Members in Higher Education: A Case Study

Career sacrifice for an LGBTQ-friendly work environment? a choice experiment to investigate the job preferences of LGBTQ people