Abstract:Extensive literature probes labor market discrimination through correspondence studies in which researchers send pairs of resumes to employers, which are closely matched except for social signals such as gender or ethnicity. Upon perceiving these signals, individuals quickly activate associated stereotypes. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske 2002) categorizes these stereotypes into two dimensions: warmth and competence. Our research integrates findings from correspondence studies with theories of social psychology, asking: Can discrimination between social groups, measured through employer callback disparities, be predicted by warmth and competence perceptions of social signals? We collect callback rates from 21 published correspondence studies, varying for 592 social signals. On those social signals, we collected warmth and competence perceptions from an independent group of online raters. We found that social perception predicts callback disparities for studies varying race and gender, which are indirectly signaled by names on these resumes. Yet, for studies adjusting other categories like sexuality and disability, the influence of social perception on callbacks is inconsistent. For instance, a more favorable perception of signals like parenthood does not consistently lead to increased callbacks, underscoring the necessity for further research. Our research offers pivotal strategies to address labor market discrimination in practice. Leveraging the warmth and competence framework allows for the predictive identification of bias against specific groups without extensive correspondence studies. By distilling hiring discrimination into these two dimensions, we not only facilitate the development of decision support systems for hiring managers but also equip computer scientists with a foundational framework for debiasing Large Language Models and other methods that are increasingly employed in hiring processes.

LinkedOut? A Field Experiment on Discrimination in Job Network Formation

Race and Networks in the Job Search Process

Social Networks as a Mechanism for Discrimination

Potential bias when using social media for selection: Differential effects of candidate demographic characteristics, race match, perceived similarity, and profile detail

Racial Minorities Face Discrimination From Across the Political Spectrum When Seeking to Form Ties on Social Media: Evidence From a Field Experiment

Does Fair Ranking Improve Minority Outcomes? Understanding the Interplay of Human and Algorithmic Biases in Online Hiring

Lowering the Playing Field: Discrimination through Sequential Spillover Effects

Getting In, Getting Hired, Getting Sideways Looks: Organizational Hierarchy and Perceptions of Racial Discrimination

Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms

Gender Gaps in Online Social Connectivity, Promotion and Relocation Reports on LinkedIn

Discrimination in the gig economy: the experiences of Black online English teachers

Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

The Role of Social Networks in Determining Earnings: A Comparison Analysis of Four Racial and Ethnic Groups

Social media and recruitment: examining (counter) productive diversity messages

Networked Inequality: Preferential Attachment Bias in Graph Neural Network Link Prediction

Algorithms that "Don't See Color": Comparing Biases in Lookalike and Special Ad Audiences

Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search

Link recommendations: Their impact on network structure and minorities

Equilibria, Efficiency, and Inequality in Network Formation for Hiring and Opportunity

A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Market