Comparison of Aversion to Visual Dental Stimuli Between Patients and Dentists: A Preliminary Study
Satoshi Tanaka,Hiroyuki Karibe,Yuichi Kato,Ayuko Okamoto,Michihiko Koeda,Tomoko Hama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s447526
2024-03-09
Patient Preference and Adherence
Abstract:Satoshi Tanaka, 1 Hiroyuki Karibe, 1 Yuichi Kato, 1 Ayuko Okamoto, 1 Michihiko Koeda, 2 Tomoko Hama 3 1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; 2 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; 3 Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ehime Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ehime, Japan Correspondence: Hiroyuki Karibe, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan, Tel +81 3 3261 6524, Fax +81 3 5216 3720, Email Purpose: Fearful dental patients often cite various dental instruments or procedures as triggers for their dental fear. Thus, visual dental stimuli provoke anxiety. This preliminary study aimed to assess the level of aversion to visual stimuli in dental patients and compare it with that in dentists. Patients and Methods: A total of 43 dental patients (25 women, 18 men; average age, 29.9 ± 13.3 years; patient group) and 13 dentists (4 women, 9 men; average age, 28.2 ± 2.0 years; dentist group) were included. All participants had previously undergone dental treatment. The dental fear level was assessed using the self-reported Dental Fear Survey (DFS). Thirty-two images associated with dental treatment were prepared and classified into three categories: dental instruments, dental procedures, and the dental environment. All participants rated their level of disgust toward each image on a visual analog scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Results: In the patient group, the disgust ratings for tooth extraction, dental drilling, and local anesthesia were > 60, which were significantly different from those in the dentist group (Mann–Whitney U- test, p < 0.001, p =0.001, and p =0.001, respectively). The ranking order of the disgust ratings for the 32 images showed significant correlation between the patient and dentist groups (Spearman correlation coefficient, r=0.80, p < 0.001). In the patient group, the disgust ratings for dental impressions and the interdental brush, dental light, and dental chair were significantly correlated with DFS scores (r=0.61, p < 0.001; r=0.47, p =0.001; r=0.41, p =0.006; and r=0.40, p =0.008, respectively). Conclusion: This study revealed that patients have more negative feelings toward invasive procedures than dentists. However, a significant correlation was identified between the ranking of aversion-provoking dental stimuli by patients and dentists. Furthermore, the level of aversion to several dental-related items that do not cause pain was correlated with the dental fear level. Keywords: dental anxiety, pain perception, visual stimuli, dental impression, visual analog scale Dental fear/anxiety are prevalent worldwide and are common in all age groups. 1 Moreover, the prevalence of dental fear has remained constant for several decades, 2 and 64% of adults feel nervous about dental treatment. 3 Dental fear ranges from moderate to extreme, and a recent systematic review estimated that the prevalence of high dental fear in adults is approximately 12%. 4 Some individuals experience mild fear, whereas others avoid visiting a dentist even when experiencing significant discomfort. Usually, fearful patients can easily identify the aspects of dental treatment that they find most repulsive. 5 Although the most common fear-inducing stimuli are injections; the sound, sight, and smell of drills; and the pain associated with dental procedures, fearful patients may cite various dental instruments or procedures as triggers for their dental fear. 6 In a study in the Netherlands, the top sources of dental fear were constant regardless of the patient's sex, regional differences, and dental fear level. 7 However, few surveys have evaluated dental fear in the Japanese population. 8,9 Furthermore, no survey has evaluated dentists' perspectives toward sources of dental fear. Dentists may have no feelings toward the instruments they use during treatment; however, these instruments may be sources of fear for their patients. Knowing the difference between dentists' and patients' perceptions may help dentists become friendlier with their patients and gain their trust. Understanding the patient's perspective is an essential component of the transition from provider- to patient-centered care. 10 Patients perceive unpleasant stimuli during dental treatment using various senses (sight, hearing, smell, touch, and taste). Various neuro -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal