A Feasibility Study of Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation Directly Used in VMAT Planning Design and Optimization for Cervical Cancer

Along Chen,Fei Chen,Xiaofang Li,Yazhi Zhang,Li Chen,Lixin Chen,Jinhan Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.908903
IF: 4.7
2022-06-01
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Purpose To investigate the dosimetric impact on target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) when unmodified auto-segmented OAR contours are directly used in the design of treatment plans. Materials and Methods A total of 127 patients with cervical cancer were collected for retrospective analysis, including 105 patients in the training set and 22 patients in the testing set. The 3D U-net architecture was used for model training and auto-segmentation of nine types of organs at risk. The auto-segmented and manually segmented organ contours were used for treatment plan optimization to obtain the AS-VMAT (automatic segmentations VMAT) plan and the MS-VMAT (manual segmentations VMAT) plan, respectively. Geometric accuracy between the manual and predicted contours were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance-to-agreement (MDA), and Hausdorff distance (HD). The dose volume histogram (DVH) and the gamma passing rate were used to identify the dose differences between the AS-VMAT plan and the MS-VMAT plan. Results Average DSC, MDA and HD 95 across all OARs were 0.82–0.96, 0.45–3.21 mm, and 2.30–17.31 mm on the testing set, respectively. The D 99% in the rectum and the Dmean in the spinal cord were 6.04 Gy (P = 0.037) and 0.54 Gy (P = 0.026) higher, respectively, in the AS-VMAT plans than in the MS-VMAT plans. The V 20 , V 30 , and V 40 in the rectum increased by 1.35% (P = 0.027), 1.73% (P = 0.021), and 1.96% (P = 0.008), respectively, whereas the V 10 in the spinal cord increased by 1.93% (P = 0.011). The differences in other dosimetry parameters were not statistically significant. The gamma passing rates in the clinical target volume (CTV) were 92.72% and 98.77%, respectively, using the 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria, which satisfied the clinical requirements. Conclusions The dose distributions of target volumes were unaffected when auto-segmented organ contours were used in the design of treatment plans, whereas the impact of automated segmentation on the doses to OARs was complicated. We suggest that the auto-segmented contours of tissues in close proximity to the target volume need to be carefully checked and corrected when necessary.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?