Abstract:To quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate a deep learning auto contouring model for prostate radiotherapy patients with pretreatment insertion of a hydrogel spacer (about water equivalent with no contrast) between prostate and rectum. The model employs convolutional neural networks (CNN) to learn features from input images that can be used to generate semantic segmentation. The study used 163 patients from three specialized GU radiation oncologists (referred to as A/B/C). The first 135 patients (A/B/C = 82/39/14) were used for training (125) and validation (10). The validation patients were randomly selected. The validated model was tested on 28 patients (A/B/C = 18/6/4) accrued during model development. There was no change of practice during the whole period. A simulation CT and MR were taken on the same day for each patient. In manual contouring, with MR fused to CT, spacer was contoured on T2 MR, prostate on CT with MR guidance, and other structures on CT only. The model was trained to auto contour prostate, proximal seminal vesicles (SV), bladder, rectum, penile bulb, femurs and spacer on CT without MR. Quantitatively, auto contours were evaluated against manual contours using the following metrics: sensitivity (% of voxels correctly drawn), false positive rate (FPR, % of voxels overdrawn), dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95-percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean distances (dmean) between the two contours over all slices. The structures with high DSC were qualitatively evaluated by the original attending using a 1 (acceptable with minor editing), 2 (editable with efficiency gain over manual contouring) and 3 (rejected for no efficiency gain or gross error) scoring system. A gross error on rectum occurred for two patients (A/B = 1/1). These two points were excluded from quantitative analysis but counted as rejected in qualitative evaluation. On average, DSC was high for femurs (>0.95) and bladder (0.91), moderate for prostate (0.85) and rectum (0.81), but low for bulb (0.67), proximal SV (0.62) and spacer (0.52). For right femur/left femur/bladder/prostate/rectum, sensitivity = 0.93/0.92/0.88/0.86/0.81, FPR = 1.8%/1.5%/4.5%/15%/17%, 95% 95%-HD = 2.8/2.6/12.1/7.4/9.5 mm, and dmean = 0.9/1.0/2.6/2.5/2.4 mm. Qualitatively, femurs scored 1 in all cases. The average scores for bladder/prostate/rectum = 1.28/1.44/1.50, 1.83/2.17/1.67, 1.25/1.50/1.25 for physicians A, B, C, respectively, and 1.39/1.61/1.50 overall. Prostate and rectum both scored well below 2, despite their lower quantitative performance, as some errors caused by the inaccurate prediction of spacer without MR were deemed easily correctable by the physicians. The model produced clinically satisfactory results, both quantitatively and qualitatively, for femurs, bladder, prostate and rectum. The results for proximal SV and bulb were less ideal. The model drew the spacer in the correct location, but could not draw it accurately due to lack of contrast on CT.

Clinical evaluation on automatic segmentation results of convolutional neural networks in rectal cancer radiotherapy

Automated Clinical Target Volume Delineation Using Deep 3D Neural Networks in Radiation Therapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of a Deep Learning Auto Contouring Model for Prostate Cancer Patients with Hydrogel Spacer

Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation for Size and Volumetric Measurement of Breast Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Dosimetric Analysis of Radiation Treatment Plans Based on a Deep Learning Auto Contouring Model for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

Automatic delineation of the clinical target volume and organs at risk by deep learning for rectal cancer postoperative radiotherapy

Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based automatic clinical target volume segmentation: a single-institution multi-site tumor experience

Automatic segmentation of high-risk clinical target volume and organs at risk in brachytherapy of cervical cancer with a convolutional neural network

CNN-Based Quality Assurance for Automatic Segmentation of Breast Cancer in Radiotherapy.

A Deep Learning Based Automatic Segmentation Approach for Anatomical Structures in Intensity Modulation Radiotherapy

Clinical evaluation of the convolutional neural network‑based automatic delineation tool in determining the clinical target volume and organs at risk in rectal cancer radiotherapy

Technical Note: A deep learning based auto segmentation of rectal tumors in MR images.

Clinical Application and Improvement of a CNN-based Autosegmentation Model for Clinical Target Volumes in Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy

Comprehensive evaluation of a deep learning model for automatic organs at risk segmentation on heterogeneous computed tomography images for abdominal radiotherapy

Automatic delineation of cervical cancer target volumes in small samples based on multi-decoder and semi-supervised learning and clinical application

Deep learning-based segmentation for high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer using 3D Prompt-ResUNet

Fully Semantic Segmentation for Rectal Cancer Based on Post-Ncrt MRl Modality and Deep Learning Framework

A student trained convolutional neural network competing with a commercial AI software and experts in organ at risk segmentation

Clinical Evaluation of Deep Learning–based Clinical Target Volume Three-Channel Auto-Segmentation Algorithm for Adaptive Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer

A Novel Deep Learning Based Auto Segmentation for Rectum Tumor on MRI Image

Clinical target volume (CTV) automatic delineation using deep learning network for cervical cancer radiotherapy: A study with external validation