Abstract:Background and Purpose: Automatic segmentation model is proven to be efficient in delineation of organs at risk (OARs) in radiotherapy; its performance is usually evaluated with geometric differences between automatic and manual delineations. However, dosimetric differences attract more interests than geometric differences in the clinic. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of automatic segmentation with dosimetric metrics for volumetric modulated arc therapy of esophageal cancer patients.Methods: Nineteen esophageal cancer cases were included in this study. Clinicians manually delineated the target volumes and the OARs for each case. Another set of OARs was automatically generated using convolutional neural network models. The radiotherapy plans were optimized with the manually delineated targets and the automatically delineated OARs separately. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA). Dosimetric metrics of manually and automatically delineated OARs were obtained and compared. The clinically acceptable dose difference and volume difference of OARs between manual and automatic delineations are supposed to be within 1 Gy and 1%, respectively.Results: Average DSC values were greater than 0.92 except for the spinal cord (0.82), and average MDA values were <0.90 mm except for the heart (1.74 mm). Eleven of the 20 dosimetric metrics of the OARs were not significant (P > 0.05). Although there were significant differences (P < 0.05) for the spinal cord (D2%), left lung (V10, V20, V30, and mean dose), and bilateral lung (V10, V20, V30, and mean dose), their absolute differences were small and acceptable for the clinic. The maximum dosimetric metrics differences of OARs between manual and automatic delineations were ΔD2% = 0.35 Gy for the spinal cord and ΔV30 = 0.4% for the bilateral lung, which were within the clinical criteria in this study.Conclusion: Dosimetric metrics were proposed to evaluate the automatic delineation in radiotherapy planning of esophageal cancer. Consequently, the automatic delineation could substitute the manual delineation for esophageal cancer radiotherapy planning based on the dosimetric evaluation in this study.

A dosimetric evaluation of treatment planning based on optimal auto-segmentation

Automatic Segmentation of Organs at Risk for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Smart Segmentation and MIM Atlas

Volumetric and Dosimetric Variations in Radiation Treatment Planning Using CT Images Based on Different Reconstructed Field-of-view

Dosimetric Analysis of Radiation Treatment Plans Based on a Deep Learning Auto Contouring Model for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

Contour Similarity and Its Implication on Inverse Prostate SBRT Treatment Planning.

A Feasibility Study of Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation Directly Used in VMAT Planning Design and Optimization for Cervical Cancer

Evaluation of Automatic Segmentation Model With Dosimetric Metrics for Radiotherapy of Esophageal Cancer

The dosimetric impact of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk on nasopharyngeal and rectal cancer

SU‐E‐T‐334: Dosimetric Impacts of Organ at Risk (OAR) Contour Errors in Prostate Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Planning: A Sensitivity Study

Commissioning of an atlas-based auto-segmentation software for application in organ contouring of radiotherapy planning

Dosimetry Validation Study for Automated Head and Neck Cancer Organs at Risk Segmentation Using Stratified Learning and Neural Architecture Search

A Deep Learning Based Automatic Segmentation Approach for Anatomical Structures in Intensity Modulation Radiotherapy

Application of Autosegmentation Software in Esophageal Cancer

The Clinical Evaluation of Atlas-Based Auto-Segmentation for Automatic Contouring During Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy

SU-E-T-134: Dosimetric Implications from Organ Segmentation

Evaluation of Deep Learning‐based Auto‐segmentation Algorithms for Delineating Clinical Target Volume and Organs at Risk Involving Data for 125 Cervical Cancer Patients

Clinical Feasibility of Atlas-Based Auto-Segmentation Software in Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer

Feasibility Study on Constructing Dosimetric Correlated Geometric Parameters for Automatic Segmentation Evaluation

Cmar_a_226495 12439..12445

Dose-volume-based evaluation of convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation of thoracic organs at risk

Quality assurance of organs-at-risk delineation in radiotherapy