Abstract:When making inferences about the mental lives of others (e.g., others' preferences), it is critical to consider the extent to which the choices we observe are constrained. Prior research on the development of this tendency indicates a contradictory pattern: Children show remarkable sensitivity to constraints in traditional experimental paradigms, yet often fail to consider real‐world constraints and privilege inherent causes instead. We propose that one explanation for this discrepancy may be that real‐world constraints are often stable over time and lose their salience. The present research tested whether children (N = 133, 5‐ to 12‐year‐old mostly US children; 55% female, 45% male) become less sensitive to an actor's constraints after first observing two constrained actors (Stable condition) versus after first observing two actors in contexts with greater choice (Not Stable condition). We crossed the stability of the constraint with the type of constraint: either the constraint was deterministic such that there was only one option available (No Other Option constraint) or, in line with many real‐world constraints, the constraint was probabilistic such that there was another option, but it was difficult to access (Hard to Access constraint). Results indicated that children in the Stable condition became less sensitive to the probabilistic Hard to Access constraint across trials. Notably, we also found that children's sensitivity to constraints was enhanced in the Not Stable condition regardless of whether the constraint was probabilistic or deterministic. We discuss implications for children's sensitivity to real‐world constraints. Research Highlights This research addresses the apparent contradiction that children are sensitive to constraints in experimental paradigms but are often insensitive to constraints in the real world. One explanation for this discrepancy is that constraints in the real world tend to be stable over time and may lose their salience. When probabilistic constraints (i.e., when a second option is available but hard to access) are stable, children become de‐sensitized to constraints across trials. First observing contexts with greater choice increases children's sensitivity to both probabilistic and deterministic constraints.

Stable Causal Relationships Are Better Causal Relationships

The perceived dilution of causal strength

Robustness of Causal Claims

Function of Beliefs and Covariation in Judging Interactions between Two Causal Candidates

Reasoning about causal relationships: Inferences on causal networks.

Stable learning establishes some common ground between causal inference and machine learning

Don't throw the associative baby out with the Bayesian bathwater: Children are more associative when reasoning retrospectively under information processing demands

Nonlinearity, Feedback and Uniform Consistency in Causal Structural Learning

Contiguity and covariation in human causal inference

The Influence of Beliefs and Covariation in Causal Reasoning

How barriers become invisible: Children are less sensitive to constraints that are stable over time

Causality on Longitudinal Data: Stable Specification Search in Constrained Structural Equation Modeling

Subjective Causality

Effects of Causes and Causes of Effects

The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution

Extending a rational process model of causal reasoning: Assessing Markov violations and explaining away with inhibitory causal relations.

Causal Judgments in the Concentrative Presentations of Information with Different External Representations

Causality in Cognitive Neuroscience: Concepts, Challenges, and Distributional Robustness

The Preference for Joint Attributions over Contrast-Factor Attributions in Causal Contrast Situations.

Causal theory error in college students' understanding of science studies