Abstract:Introduction Children younger than 4 years old often have difficulties in understanding others' mental states(e.g.,beliefs).One explanation for these difficulties is what is referred to as "the curse of knowledge" or a tendency to be biased by one's own knowledge when appreciating an ignorant perspective.It is different from egocentric bias in that the curse of knowledge is asymmetric.The present study aimed to investigate the characteristics of the curse of knowledge in different tasks(knowledge-attribution and desire-attribution) and,particularly,to identify whether there is also an asymmetric bias in children's desire for understanding. Method Two experiments were conducted based on 108 participating children ages 3 to 5 years old.In Experiment 1,a knowledge-attribution task was administered to these children.The children were asked to judge whether a puppet would know what was in a container(a box or an envelope),with which the children were either familiar or unfamiliar.Two conditions for children's knowledge were designed.One was that children were knowledgeable of what was inside the container.The other condition was that children were unknowledgeable.In Experiment 2,a desire-attribution task was administered.The children were told of presents a puppet liked or disliked and were asked to choose a present for the puppet according to its likes and dislikes. Results The results showed that children demonstrated an egocentric bias in the knowledge-attribution task.When the children themselves were knowledgeable of the contents inside the container,they tended to overestimate the puppet's knowledge of it.However,when the children were ignorant of the contents,they tended to underestimate the puppet's knowledge.In contrast,children demonstrated an asymmetric bias in the desire-attribution task.Younger children at the age of 3 tended to assume their own favorite as that of the puppet's even though the reality was otherwise.However,all participating children made much more successful inferences when their own preferences did not interfere. Discussion and conclusion The inconsistent findings in the two tasks might result from the differences of the task requirements and the contradiction between children and the character in the tasks.In the knowledge-attribution task,the conflict between children and the character was the only knowledge state about the reality.However,in the desire-attribution task,the conflict involved the desire.Because knowledge state was a kind of neutral state,whereas desire involved emotion,the degree of conflict differed between the two tasks.Furthermore,desire-attribution might require much more cognitive control to inhibit one's own preference,which might be related to the asymmetric bias.Thus,in contexts requiring less cognitive control,children tended to be able to take others' perspective much more easily than in a more conflicting context.In conclusion,the results suggest that perspective bias in younger children' s mental state reasoning is context specific.

Don't throw the associative baby out with the Bayesian bathwater: Children are more associative when reasoning retrospectively under information processing demands

Children's On-Line Processing of Epistemic Modals.

Children's Knowledge of Free Choice Inferences

Children’s use of reasoning by exclusion to infer objects’ identities in working memory

The influence of complexity and reasoning direction on children's causal reasoning

Children's reasoning about continuous causal processes: The role of verbal and non-verbal ability

Inferring Unseen Causes: Developmental and Evolutionary Origins

Children's recognition of causal system categories across superficially distinct events

Counterfactual reasoning: From childhood to adulthood

Causal relational problem solving in toddlers

Developmental reconstruction of cognitive ability: Interactions between executive, cognizance, and reasoning processes in childhood

Probabilistic causal reasoning under time pressure

Do toddlers reason about other people's experiences of objects? A limit to early mental state reasoning

Prediction Error During Retrospective Revaluation of Causal Associations in Humans: Fmri Evidence in Favor of an Associative Model of Learning

Inferential reasoning by exclusion in children (Homo sapiens).

Young Children Integrate Current Observations, Priors and Agent Information to Build Predictive Models of Others’ Actions

Heuristic Bias in Children'S Reasoning in the Personal Domain

The Perspective Bias in Children's Mental-State Reasoning

Causal learning by infants and young children: From computational theories to language practices

Predicting Learning: Understanding the Role of Executive Functions in Children's Belief Revision Using Bayesian Models

Inhibition of misleading heuristics as a core mechanism for typical cognitive development: evidence from behavioural and brain-imaging studies