Abstract:Our brains predict future sensory input based on their current beliefs about the world around us, but interpreting prediction errors can be challenging in a volatile environment because they can be caused by stochastic noise or by outdated predictions. Noisy signals should be integrated with prior beliefs to improve precision, but the two should be segregated when environmental changes render prior beliefs irrelevant. Bayesian inference provides a statistically optimal solution to deal with situations in which there is uncertainty about the cause of the prediction errors. However, the method quickly becomes memory intensive and computationally intractable when applied consecutively. Here, we systematically evaluate the predictive performance of Bayesian causal inference for human perceptual decisions in a spatial prediction task based on noisy audiovisual sequences with occasional changepoints. We elucidate the simplifying assumptions of a previously proposed reduced Bayesian observer model, and we compare it to an extensive set of models based on alternative simplification strategies. Model-free analyses revealed the hallmarks of Bayesian causal inference: participants seem to have integrated sensory evidence with prior beliefs to improve accuracy when prediction errors were small, and prior influence gradually decreased as prediction errors grew larger, signalling probable irrelevance of the prior due to a changepoint. Model comparison results further supported the hypotheses that participants computed probability-weighted averages over the causal options (noise or changepoint) and that they iteratively summarized their beliefs while accounting for causal uncertainty akin to the reduced Bayesian observer model. However, we also found that participants' reliance on prior beliefs was systematically smaller than predicted by the model, and this was best explained by individually fitting lower-than-optimal parameters for the a-priori probability of prior relevance. We conclude that perceptual belief updating in volatile environments with stochastic noise is well described by a simplified model of consecutive Bayesian causal inference. Observers utilize priors flexibly to the extent that they are deemed relevant, though also conservatively with a lower tendency to bind than an ideal Bayesian observer.

Probabilistic causal reasoning under time pressure

Reasoning strategy moderates the transition between slow and fast reasoning

Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty

Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models

Naïve theories of causal force and compression of elapsed time judgments.

Extending a rational process model of causal reasoning: Assessing Markov violations and explaining away with inhibitory causal relations.

A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning

Don't throw the associative baby out with the Bayesian bathwater: Children are more associative when reasoning retrospectively under information processing demands

Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory

Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making

Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts

The Ubiquity of Time in Latent-cause Inference

How Time Pressure in Different Phases of Decision-Making Influences Human-AI Collaboration

Time-Critical Reasoning: Representations and Application

Reducing the Influence of Time Pressure on Risky Choice

Accuracy-Time Tradeoffs in AI-Assisted Decision Making under Time Pressure

Chronometric evidence for memory retrieval in causal conditional reasoning: the case of the association strength effect

Culpable Control and Counterfactual Reasoning in the Psychology of Blame

Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them

What mechanisms mediate prior probability effects on rapid-choice decision-making?

How relevant is the prior? Bayesian causal inference for dynamic perception in volatile environments