Abstract:The framework of Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (PCH) formalizes three types of reasoning: observational, interventional, and counterfactual, that reflect the progressive sophistication of human thought regarding causation. We investigate the computational complexity aspects of reasoning in this framework focusing mainly on satisfiability problems expressed in probabilistic and causal languages across the PCH. That is, given a system of formulas in the standard probabilistic and causal languages, does there exist a model satisfying the formulas? The resulting complexity changes depending on the level of the hierarchy as well as the operators allowed in the formulas (addition, multiplication, or marginalization). We focus on formulas involving marginalization that are widely used in probabilistic and causal inference, but whose complexity issues are still little explored. Our main contribution are the exact computational complexity results showing that linear languages (allowing addition and marginalization) yield NP^PP-, PSPACE-, and NEXP-complete satisfiability problems, depending on the level of the PCH. Moreover, we prove that the problem for the full language (allowing additionally multiplication) is complete for the class succ$\exists$R for languages on the highest, counterfactual level, which extends previous results for the lower levels of the PCH. Finally, we consider constrained models that are restricted to a given Bayesian network, a Directed Acyclic Graph structure, or a small polynomial size. The complexity of languages on the interventional level is increased to the complexity of counterfactual languages without such a constraint, that is, linear languages become NEXP-complete. On the other hand, the complexity on the counterfactual level does not change. The constraint on the size reduces the complexity of the interventional and counterfactual languages to NEXP-complete.

Robustness of Causal Claims

Robust Causal Analysis of Linear Cyclic Systems With Hidden Confounders

Stable Causal Relationships Are Better Causal Relationships

On the probability of a causal inference is robust for internal validity

Probabilistic and Causal Satisfiability: the Impact of Marginalization

Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach

Causality in Cognitive Neuroscience: Concepts, Challenges, and Distributional Robustness

ROCK: Causal Inference Principles for Reasoning about Commonsense Causality

Robust agents learn causal world models

A Ramsey Test Analysis of Causation for Causal Models

Argumentative Causal Discovery

Reconciling Causality and Statistics

Robust Causality and False Attribution in Data-Driven Earth Science Discoveries

Probabilities of Causation: Role of Observational Data

Statistics and Causal Inference

A Conceptual Framework for Quantifying the Robustness of a Regression-Based Causal Inference in Observational Study

Clustering and Structural Robustness in Causal Diagrams

Enabling Runtime Verification of Causal Discovery Algorithms with Automated Conditional Independence Reasoning (Extended Version)

A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning

Assumption violations in causal discovery and the robustness of score matching