A Ramsey Test Analysis of Causation for Causal Models

Holger Andreas,Mario Günther
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy074
2021-06-01
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Abstract:We aim to devise a Ramsey test analysis of actual causation. Our method is to define a strengthened Ramsey test for causal models. Unlike the accounts of Halpern and Pearl ([<a class="tab-link" href="#axy074-B11">2005</a>]) and Halpern ([<a class="tab-link" href="#axy074-B7">2015</a>]), the resulting analysis deals satisfactorily with both overdetermination and conjunctive scenarios. <strong>1.  </strong>Introduction<strong>2.  </strong>An Extension of Causal Model Semantics <strong>2.1.  </strong>Halpern and Pearl's causal model semantics<strong>2.2.  </strong>Agnostic models<strong>3.  </strong>A Strengthened Ramsey Test for Causal Models <strong>3.1.  </strong>The Ramsey test and causal models<strong>3.2.  </strong>A strengthened Ramsey test for causal models<strong>3.3.  </strong>A Ramsey test definition of actual causation<strong>3.4.  </strong>Minimality<strong>4.  </strong>Applying the Definition of Actual Causation <strong>4.1.  </strong>Overdetermination and conjunctive scenarios<strong>4.2.  </strong>Preemption<strong>4.3.  </strong>Conjunctive and disjunctive scenarios combined<strong>5.  </strong>Comparison to the Halpern–Pearl Definitions <strong>5.1.  </strong>Conjunctive scenarios<strong>5.2.  </strong>Preemption<strong>5.3.  </strong>Symmetric overdetermination<strong>5.4.  </strong>Summary<strong>5.5.  </strong>A note on causal models<strong>6.  </strong>Conclusion
What problem does this paper attempt to address?