Abstract:"Correlation does not imply causation" is a famous mantra in statistical and visual analysis. However, consumers of visualizations often draw causal conclusions when only correlations between variables are shown. In this paper, we investigate factors that contribute to causal relationships users perceive in visualizations. We collected a corpus of concept pairs from variables in widely used datasets and created visualizations that depict varying correlative associations using three typical statistical chart types. We conducted two MTurk studies on (1) preconceived notions on causal relations without charts, and (2) perceived causal relations with charts, for each concept pair. Our results indicate that people make assumptions about causal relationships between pairs of concepts even without seeing any visualized data. Moreover, our results suggest that these assumptions constitute causal priors that, in combination with visualized association, impact how data visualizations are interpreted. The results also suggest that causal priors may lead to over- or under-estimation in perceived causal relations in different circumstances, and that those priors can also impact users' confidence in their causal assessments. In addition, our results align with prior work, indicating that chart type may also affect causal inference. Using data from the studies, we develop a model to capture the interaction between causal priors and visualized associations as they combine to impact a user's perceived causal relations. In addition to reporting the study results and analyses, we provide an open dataset of causal priors for 56 specific concept pairs that can serve as a potential benchmark for future studies. We also suggest remaining challenges and heuristic-based guidelines to help designers improve visualization design choices to better support visual causal inference.

Causal Judgments in the Concentrative Presentations of Information with Different External Representations

Functional roles and cultural modulations of the medial prefrontal and parietal activity associated with causal attribution

Causal Priors and Their Influence on Judgements of Causality in Visualized Data

Social cues help us construct the causal perception of physical events

Probability Distribution of Causal Linguistic Features.

Perceived Causalities of Physical Events Are Influenced by Social Cues

Psychological and Normative Theories of Causal Power and the Probabilities of Causes

On the Representation of Causal Background Knowledge and its Applications in Causal Inference

Building Object-based Causal Programs for Human-like Generalization

Revisiting causal pluralism: Intention, process, and dependency in cases of double prevention

Subjective Causality

Personal and Collective Culpability Judgment

The Influence of Cause Density on Causal Strength Estimate

Cultural Differences in the Representativeness Heuristic: Expecting A Correspondence in Magnitude Between Cause and Effect

Everything that can be learned about a causal structure with latent variables by observational and interventional probing schemes

Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events.

Is causation deterministic or probabilistic? A critique of Frosch and Johnson-Laird (2011)

Illusion of Causality in Visualized Data

Contiguity and covariation in human causal inference

The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution

Causal markers in tobacco industry documents: the pragmatics of responsibility