Abstract:There has been a major shift in research on human reasoning toward Bayesian and probabilistic approaches, which has been called a new paradigm. The new paradigm sees most everyday and scientific reasoning as taking place in a context of uncertainty, and inference is from uncertain beliefs and not from arbitrary assumptions. In this manuscript we present an empirical test of normative standards in the new paradigm using a novel probabilized conditional reasoning task. Our results indicated that for everyday conditional with at least a weak causal connection between antecedent and consequent only the conditional probability of the consequent given antecedent contributes unique variance to predicting the probability of conditional, but not the probability of the conjunction, nor the probability of the material conditional. Regarding normative accounts of reasoning, we found significant evidence that participants' responses were confidence preserving (i.e., p-valid in the sense of Adams, 1998) for MP inferences, but not for MT inferences. Additionally, only for MP inferences and to a lesser degree for DA inferences did the rate of responses inside the coherence intervals defined by mental probability logic (Pfeifer and Kleiter, 2005, 2010) exceed chance levels. In contrast to the normative accounts, the dual-source model (Klauer et al., 2010) is a descriptive model. It posits that participants integrate their background knowledge (i.e., the type of information primary to the normative approaches) and their subjective probability that a conclusion is seen as warranted based on its logical form. Model fits showed that the dual-source model, which employed participants' responses to a deductive task with abstract contents to estimate the form-based component, provided as good an account of the data as a model that solely used data from the probabilized conditional reasoning task.

Is causation deterministic or probabilistic? A critique of Frosch and Johnson-Laird (2011)

On the probabilistic character of irreducible mental causation

Revisiting causal pluralism: Intention, process, and dependency in cases of double prevention

Causality in Cognitive Neuroscience: Concepts, Challenges, and Distributional Robustness

Effects of Causes and Causes of Effects

A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning

Extending a rational process model of causal reasoning: Assessing Markov violations and explaining away with inhibitory causal relations.

Subjective Causality

Psychological and Normative Theories of Causal Power and the Probabilities of Causes

Causality without potential outcomes and the dynamic approach

Actual causation and the art of modeling

New normative standards of conditional reasoning and the dual-source model

Avoidance of causality outside experiments: Hypotheses from cognitive dissonance reduction

An improved probabilistic account of counterfactual reasoning.

Causal intuition in the indefinite world: Meta-analysis and simulations

The Cause-Effect Problem: Motivation, Ideas, and Popular Misconceptions

Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them

Causal modelling without introducing counterfactuals or abstract distributions

Uncertainty promotes neuroreductionism: A behavioral online study on folk psychological causal inference from neuroimaging data

Is There Causation in Fundamental Physics? New Insights from Process Matrices and Quantum Causal Modelling