Abstract:How consciousness arises from brain activity has been a topic of intense scientific research for decades. But how does one identify the neural basis of something that is intrinsically personal and subjective? A hallmark approach has been to ask observers to judge stimuli as 'seen' (conscious) and 'unseen' (unconscious) and use post hoc sorting of neural measurements based these judgments. Unfortunately, cognitive and response biases are known to strongly affect how observers place their criterion for judging stimuli as 'seen' vs. 'unseen', thereby confounding neural measures of consciousness. Surprisingly however, the effect of conservative and liberal criterion placement on neural measures of unconscious and conscious processing has never been explicitly investigated. Here we use simulations and electrophysiological brain measurements to show that conservative criterion placement has an unintuitive consequence: rather than selectively providing a cautious estimate of conscious processing, it inflates effect sizes in neural measures of both conscious and unconscious processing, while liberal criterion placement does the reverse. After showing this in simulation, we performed decoding analyses on two electroencephalography studies that employ common subjective indicators of conscious awareness, in which we experimentally manipulated the response criterion. The results confirm that the predicted confounding effects of criterion placement on neural measures of unconscious and conscious processing occur in empirical data, while further showing that the most widely used subjective scale, the Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS), does not guard against criterion confounds. Follow up simulations explicate how the experimental context determines whether the relative confounding effect of criterion placement is larger in neural measures of either conscious or unconscious processing. We conclude that criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of conscious and unconscious processing.

Uncertainty promotes neuroreductionism: A behavioral online study on folk psychological causal inference from neuroimaging data

The seductive allure of the brain: Dualism and lay perceptions of neuroscience

Computational Neuropsychology and Bayesian Inference

History-dependence shapes causal inference of brain-behaviour relationships

Heuristics and biases in medical decision-making under uncertainty: The case of neuropronostication for consciousness disorders

Avoidance of causality outside experiments: Hypotheses from cognitive dissonance reduction

On the probabilistic character of irreducible mental causation

Modeling Decision-Making in Schizophrenia: Associations Between Computationally Derived Risk Propensity and Self-Reported Risk Perception

Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias

Medical AI, inductive risk and the communication of uncertainty: the case of disorders of consciousness

Cognitive neuroscience of human counterfactual reasoning

Nature and/or Nurture: Causal Attributions of Mental Illness and Stigma

The truth is in there: Belief processes in the human brain

Exploration, inference and prediction in neuroscience and biomedicine

Neural Basis of Societal Risk for Mental Illness: Focus on Ethnic Minority Position and Racial Prejudice

Let's fail better: Using philosophical tools to improve neuroscientific research in psychiatry

Potential for Bias in the Context of Neuroethics

Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness

Towards a Unifying Cognitive, Neurophysiological, and Computational Neuroscience Account of Schizophrenia

Brain image-derived phenotypes yield insights into causal risk of psychiatric disorders using a Mendelian randomization study

Precision psychiatry needs causal inference