Abstract:Abstract Background The methods with which prediction models are usually developed mean that neither the parameters nor the predictions should be interpreted causally. For many applications, this is perfectly acceptable. However, when prediction models are used to support decision making, there is often a need for predicting outcomes under hypothetical interventions. Aims We aimed to identify published methods for developing and validating prediction models that enable risk estimation of outcomes under hypothetical interventions, utilizing causal inference. We aimed to identify the main methodological approaches, their underlying assumptions, targeted estimands, and potential pitfalls and challenges with using the method. Finally, we aimed to highlight unresolved methodological challenges. Methods We systematically reviewed literature published by December 2019, considering papers in the health domain that used causal considerations to enable prediction models to be used for predictions under hypothetical interventions. We included both methodologies proposed in statistical/machine learning literature and methodologies used in applied studies. Results We identified 4919 papers through database searches and a further 115 papers through manual searches. Of these, 87 papers were retained for full-text screening, of which 13 were selected for inclusion. We found papers from both the statistical and the machine learning literature. Most of the identified methods for causal inference from observational data were based on marginal structural models and g-estimation. Conclusions There exist two broad methodological approaches for allowing prediction under hypothetical intervention into clinical prediction models: (1) enriching prediction models derived from observational studies with estimated causal effects from clinical trials and meta-analyses and (2) estimating prediction models and causal effects directly from observational data. These methods require extending to dynamic treatment regimes, and consideration of multiple interventions to operationalise a clinical decision support system. Techniques for validating ‘causal prediction models’ are still in their infancy.

Precision psychiatry needs causal inference

Precision psychiatry: predicting predictability

Causal Inference and Counterfactual Prediction in Machine Learning for Actionable Healthcare

Precision Psychiatry Implementation in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinical Practice: Opportunities and Challenges

USING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS TO FACILITATE PRECISION PSYCHIATRY

Restoring the missing person to personalized medicine and precision psychiatry

Causal Discovery Analysis: A Promising Tool for Precision Medicine

Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them

Prediction meets causal inference: the role of treatment in clinical prediction models

How real-world data can facilitate the development of precision medicine treatment in psychiatry

The new paradigm of psychiatry precision medicine and its emerging clinical framework

Leveraging big data for causal understanding in mental health: a research framework

The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatry

A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions

Precision Psychiatry Applications with Pharmacogenomics: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approaches

Causal inference with multiple versions of treatment and application to personalized medicine

Using precision approaches to improve brain-behavior prediction

Correct deconfounding enables causal machine learning for precision medicine and beyond

Are Psychiatric Nosologies Limiting the Success of Clinical Prediction Models?

Uncertainty promotes neuroreductionism: A behavioral online study on folk psychological causal inference from neuroimaging data