Precision psychiatry: predicting predictability

Edwin van Dellen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724000370

IF: 10.592

2024-03-20

Psychological Medicine

Abstract:Precision psychiatry is an emerging field that aims to provide individualized approaches to mental health care. An important strategy to achieve this precision is to reduce uncertainty about prognosis and treatment response. Multivariate analysis and machine learning are used to create outcome prediction models based on clinical data such as demographics, symptom assessments, genetic information, and brain imaging. While much emphasis has been placed on technical innovation, the complex and varied nature of mental health presents significant challenges to the successful implementation of these models. From this perspective, I review ten challenges in the field of precision psychiatry, including the need for studies on real-world populations and realistic clinical outcome definitions, and consideration of treatment-related factors such as placebo effects and non-adherence to prescriptions. Fairness, prospective validation in comparison to current practice and implementation studies of prediction models are other key issues that are currently understudied. A shift is proposed from retrospective studies based on linear and static concepts of disease towards prospective research that considers the importance of contextual factors and the dynamic and complex nature of mental health.

psychiatry,psychology, clinical

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the issue of precision psychiatry in the field of mental health, specifically how to improve the accuracy of predicting treatment outcomes and prognosis for patients with mental disorders. Specifically, the authors discuss the following points:

1. **Reducing Uncertainty**: By using multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques, predictive models are created based on clinical data (such as demographic information, symptom assessments, genetic information, and brain imaging) to reduce uncertainty regarding prognosis and treatment response.
2. **Existing Challenges**: Although there have been technological advancements, the complexity and diversity of mental health make the successful implementation of these models face many challenges. For example, there is a need to conduct studies in real-world populations and consider the issues of defining actual clinical outcomes.
3. **Fairness and Applicability**: Emphasizes the need to consider diversity and fairness issues during model development to ensure that the models are not only technically effective but also broadly applicable in practical use.
4. **Dynamic Systems Approach**: Proposes a shift from retrospective linear and static disease concepts to prospective research, focusing on contextual factors and the dynamic and complex nature of mental health conditions.

In summary, this paper attempts to advance precision psychiatry by addressing the above issues, making it better applicable to clinical practice.