Abstract:Aim: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of papilla preservation flap surgery with or without the application of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD). This article reports on early healing events, post-operative morbidity and patient perceptions of the surgical outcomes. Material and Methods: One hundred and seventy-two patients with advanced chronic periodontitis and at least one intrabony defect of greater than or equal to3 mm were recruited in 12 centres in seven countries (European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPERIO)). Papilla preservation flaps were used to obtain access and primary closure. After debridement, and root conditioning, EMD was applied in the test subjects, and omitted in the controls. Healing was monitored 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. During the first 12 weeks of healing, supracrestal soft-tissue density was evaluated with a computer-assisted densitometric image analysis system (CADIA) using underexposed radiographs taken on a subset of 34 patients. Patient perceptions were evaluated with a questionnaire immediately after the procedure, at suture removal 1 week later and at 1 year. Results: Subjects reported little intraoperative or post-operative pain or discomfort for both test and controls. Twenty-four percent of controls and 30% of tests (p=0.64) reported a degree of interference with daily activities for an average of 3 and 3.5 days, respectively. Post-surgical edema was noted in 25% of tests and 28% of controls. Wound dehiscence in the interdental portion of the flap was uncommon (14% of tests and 12% of controls at week 1) and of limited size. Root sensitivity was the most frequent post-operative adverse event: it affected 45% of test and 35% of controls (p=0.55). Up to 6 weeks post-operatively, soft-tissue densities were significantly higher in subjects treated with EMD with respect to controls. One year after completion of the surgery, patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the outcomes. The most frequently reported benefits included the ability to preserve a tooth/dentition and to maintain/improve chewing ability. The cost and need for frequent follow-ups were cited as significant drawbacks. Conclusions: This study portrayed the early healing events, pain, discomfort and adverse events of papilla preservation flap surgery and the 1-year patient perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of periodontal surgery in intrabony defects. Earlier gains in soft-tissue density were observed following application of EMD. In terms of patient-centered outcomes, however, both procedures performed in a similar manner.

Non‐surgical retreatment versus papillary preservation flap surgery for residual pockets: A randomized controlled trial with clinical and patient‐reported outcomes

Endoscopic Re‐Instrumentation of Intrabony Defect–Associated Deep Residual Periodontal Pockets Is Non‐Inferior to Papilla Preservation Flap Surgery: A Randomized Trial

Benefits of Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery in the Treatment of Shallow Infrabony Defects: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial Describing Clinical, Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Human Intrabony Defects with GTR/bone Replacement Material or Access Flap Alone. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

The Simplified Papilla Preservation Flap in the Regenerative Treatment of Deep Intrabony Defects: Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Morbidity

Pocket closure and residual pockets after non‐surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Periodontal Regeneration Compared with Access Flap Surgery in Human Intrabony Defects 20-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial: Tooth Retention, Periodontitis Recurrence and Costs.

Healing, post-operative morbidity and patient perception of outcomes following regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects.

Papilla preservation flaps for periodontal regeneration of molars severely compromised by combined furcation and intrabony defects: Retrospective analysis of a registry‐based cohort

The flapless approach with and without enamel matrix derivatives for the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial

Clinical evaluation of periosteal pedicle flap in the treatment of gingival recessions for esthetic root coverage: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Single-flap approach for surgical debridement of deep intraosseous defects: a randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of Scaling and Root Planning with Periodontal Endoscopy for Residual Pockets in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Enamel Matrix Proteins In The Regenerative Therapy Of Deep Intrabony Defects - A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Clinical Performance of Access Flap Surgery in the Treatment of the Intrabony Defect. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Periodontal pockets: Predictors for site‐related worsening after non‐surgical therapy—A long‐term retrospective cohort study

Soft-tissue re-growth following fibre retention osseous resective surgery or osseous resective surgery: a multilevel analysis

The Simplified Papilla Preservation Flap. A Novel Surgical Approach for the Management of Soft Tissues in Regenerative Procedures

Enamel Matrix Proteins in the Regenerative Therapy of Deep Intrabony Defects

Clinical Efficacy Of Coronally Advanced Flap With Or Without Connective Tissue Graft For The Treatment Of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions In The Aesthetic Area: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial