Abstract:BackgroundSystematic reviews have established the short‐term improvements of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared to conventional surgical treatment in intrabony defects. However, a hierarchy of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures regarding the medium‐ to long‐term results of treatment does not exist. AimTo systematically assess the literature to answer the focused question "In periodontitis patients with intrabony defects, what are the medium‐ and long‐term benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared with open flap debridement (OFD), in terms of clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters and tooth retention?" Material & MethodsRandomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), reporting on clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures ≥ 3 years post‐operatively were systematically assessed. Clinical [residual probing pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, tooth loss] and radiographic [residual defect depth (RDD), bone gain (RBL)] outcome parameters, were assessed. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Bayesian random‐effects network meta‐analyses (NMA) were performed where possible. ResultsThirty RCTs, presenting data 3 to 20 years after treatment with grafting, GTR, EMD, as monotherapies, combinations thereof, and/or adjunctive use of blood derived growth factor constructs, or with OFD only, were included. NMA based on 21 RCTs showed that OFD was clearly the least efficacious treatment; regenerative/reconstructive treatments resulted in significantly shallower residual PD in 4 out 8 comparisons [range of mean differences (MD): ‐2.37 to ‐0.60 mm] and larger CAL gain in 6 out 8 comparisons (range of MD: 1.26 to 2.66 mm), and combination approaches appeared as the most efficacious. Tooth loss after regenerative/reconstructive treatment was less frequent (0.4%) compared to OFD (2.8%), but the evidence was sparse. There was only sparse radiographic data not allowing any relevant comparisons. ConclusionPeriodontal regenerative/reconstructive therapy in intrabony defects results, in general, in shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain compared with OFD, translating in high rates of tooth survival, on a medium (3‐5 years) to long‐term basis (5‐20 years). Combination approaches appear, in general, more efficacious compared to monotherapy in terms of shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain. A clear hierarchy could, however, not be established due to limited evidence.

Soft-tissue re-growth following fibre retention osseous resective surgery or osseous resective surgery: a multilevel analysis

Benefits of Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery in the Treatment of Shallow Infrabony Defects: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial Describing Clinical, Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Increased early inflammatory response and osteoclastic activity in gingival tissues following conventional osseous resective surgery compared with the fibre retention technique: a pilot study

Fibre retention osseous resective surgery: how deep is the infrabony component of the osseous-resected defects?: Depth of osseous-resected defects

Long-term effects of supportive therapy in periodontal patients treated with fibre retention osseous resective surgery. I: recurrence of pockets, bleeding on probing and tooth loss.

Clinical effectiveness of regenerative periodontal surgery and orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners in stage IV periodontitis: a case series

Autogenous periosteal barrier membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects of single-rooted teeth: a 12-month reentry randomized controlled clinical trial

Non‐surgical retreatment versus papillary preservation flap surgery for residual pockets: A randomized controlled trial with clinical and patient‐reported outcomes

Clinical evaluation and biological understanding of the early step-by-step healing after periodontal microsurgery: A case report with PES analysis comparing initial and 31-day result

Periodontal Regeneration Compared with Access Flap Surgery in Human Intrabony Defects 20-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial: Tooth Retention, Periodontitis Recurrence and Costs.

Medium‐ and long‐term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies

Prevention of gingival recession following flap debridement surgery by subepithelial connective tissue graft: consecutive case series

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a combined resective and regenerative approach in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a prospective case series

Periodontal regeneration of human infrabony defects. II. Re-entry procedures and bone measures.

Clinical efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures: consensus report of Group 2 of the 10th European Workshop on Periodontology.

The efficacy of reconstructive therapy in the surgical management of peri‐implantitis: A 3‐year follow‐up of a randomized clinical trial

Factors affecting the healing response of intrabony defects following guided tissue regeneration and access flap surgery.

Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial

Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Two Different Surgical Approaches for Treating Infrabony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis Patients

Periodontal Regeneration of Human Intrabony Defects with Bioresorbable Membranes. A Controlled Clinical Trial.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bio-Oss Granules and Bio-Oss Collagen in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: a Retrospective Cohort Study