Abstract:Aim: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of papilla preservation flap surgery with or without the application of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD). This article reports on early healing events, post-operative morbidity and patient perceptions of the surgical outcomes. Material and Methods: One hundred and seventy-two patients with advanced chronic periodontitis and at least one intrabony defect of greater than or equal to3 mm were recruited in 12 centres in seven countries (European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPERIO)). Papilla preservation flaps were used to obtain access and primary closure. After debridement, and root conditioning, EMD was applied in the test subjects, and omitted in the controls. Healing was monitored 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. During the first 12 weeks of healing, supracrestal soft-tissue density was evaluated with a computer-assisted densitometric image analysis system (CADIA) using underexposed radiographs taken on a subset of 34 patients. Patient perceptions were evaluated with a questionnaire immediately after the procedure, at suture removal 1 week later and at 1 year. Results: Subjects reported little intraoperative or post-operative pain or discomfort for both test and controls. Twenty-four percent of controls and 30% of tests (p=0.64) reported a degree of interference with daily activities for an average of 3 and 3.5 days, respectively. Post-surgical edema was noted in 25% of tests and 28% of controls. Wound dehiscence in the interdental portion of the flap was uncommon (14% of tests and 12% of controls at week 1) and of limited size. Root sensitivity was the most frequent post-operative adverse event: it affected 45% of test and 35% of controls (p=0.55). Up to 6 weeks post-operatively, soft-tissue densities were significantly higher in subjects treated with EMD with respect to controls. One year after completion of the surgery, patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the outcomes. The most frequently reported benefits included the ability to preserve a tooth/dentition and to maintain/improve chewing ability. The cost and need for frequent follow-ups were cited as significant drawbacks. Conclusions: This study portrayed the early healing events, pain, discomfort and adverse events of papilla preservation flap surgery and the 1-year patient perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of periodontal surgery in intrabony defects. Earlier gains in soft-tissue density were observed following application of EMD. In terms of patient-centered outcomes, however, both procedures performed in a similar manner.

Endoscopic Re‐Instrumentation of Intrabony Defect–Associated Deep Residual Periodontal Pockets Is Non‐Inferior to Papilla Preservation Flap Surgery: A Randomized Trial

Efficacy of Scaling and Root Planning with Periodontal Endoscopy for Residual Pockets in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Non‐surgical retreatment versus papillary preservation flap surgery for residual pockets: A randomized controlled trial with clinical and patient‐reported outcomes

Benefits of Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery in the Treatment of Shallow Infrabony Defects: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial Describing Clinical, Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Single-flap approach for surgical debridement of deep intraosseous defects: a randomized controlled trial

Clinical Effects of Scaling and Root Planing with an Adjunctive Periodontal Endoscope for Residual Pockets: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

[Comparison of clinical effects between periodontal endoscopy aiding subgingival debridement and flap surgery].

Does Enamel Matrix Derivative Application Provide Additional Clinical Benefits in Residual Periodontal Pockets Associated with Suprabony Defects? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Healing, post-operative morbidity and patient perception of outcomes following regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects.

Enamel Matrix Proteins In The Regenerative Therapy Of Deep Intrabony Defects - A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Enamel Matrix Proteins in the Regenerative Therapy of Deep Intrabony Defects

The flapless approach with and without enamel matrix derivatives for the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Comparison of Open Flap Debridement, with and without Diode Laser in the Management of Chronic Periodontitis: A Randomised Split Mouth Clinical Trial

Medium‐ and long‐term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies

Enamel matrix derivative stabilizes blood clot and improves clinical healing in deep pockets after flapless periodontal therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Periodontal Regeneration Compared with Access Flap Surgery in Human Intrabony Defects 20-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial: Tooth Retention, Periodontitis Recurrence and Costs.

The Simplified Papilla Preservation Flap in the Regenerative Treatment of Deep Intrabony Defects: Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Morbidity

Clinical evaluation of a novel protocol for supportive periodontal care: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Microsurgical access flap and enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a controlled clinical study

Platelet-rich fibrin as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in treatment of shallow periodontal pockets: A randomized clinical trial

Non-surgical treatment of residual periodontal pockets using sodium hypochlorite/amino acid gel and cross-linked hyaluronic acid-a 9-month pilot randomized controlled clinical trial