Pocket closure and residual pockets after non‐surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Filippo Citterio,Giacomo Gualini,Moontaek Chang,Gian Marco Piccoli,Marta Giraudi,Valeria Manavella,Giacomo Baima,Giulia Maria Mariani,Federica Romano,Mario Aimetti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13547
IF: 7.478
2021-11-11
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Abstract:AimTo analyse the efficacy of non surgical therapy (NST) in terms of pocket closure (PC) and changes in percentage and number of pockets.. Materials and MethodsThree databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus) were searched up to January 2020. Prospective studies with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and presenting data in terms of PC or number or percentage of pockets depths (PD) before and after NST on systemically healthy patients were included. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed. ResultsAfter screening 4610 titles and abstracts, 27 studies were included. 63.9% of PC was reported by one study. The percentage of PDs≤3mm changed from 39.06% to 64.11% with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 26.14% (p<0.001). This accounted for a relative increase of healthy sites of 64.13%. The mean percentage of PD≥5mm was 28.23% and 11.71% before and after treatment, with a WMD of 15.50 % (p<0.001). The WMD in the number of PDs≥5mm before and after treatment was 24.42 (p=0.036). The mean number of residual PPD≥5 after NST was 14.13. ConclusionsNST is able to eradicate the majority of pockets. However residual pockets after NST may remain and should be considered cautiously for further treatment planning.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?