Adjunctive local treatments for patients with residual pockets during supportive periodontal care: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Chen‐Ying Wang,Yu‐Hao Yang,Hua Li,Ping‐Yi Lin,Yu‐Ting Su,Mark Yen‐Ping Kuo,Yu‐Kang Tu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13379
IF: 7.478
2020-11-09
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Aim</h3><p>This systematic review and network meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive locally delivered antimicrobials, compared to subgingival instrumentation alone or plus a placebo, on changes in probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL), in patients with residual pockets during supportive periodontal care.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Materials and methods</h3><p>Literature search was performed with electronic databases and by hand until May 31<sup>st</sup>, 2020. Primary outcome was the changes in PPD. The treatment effects between groups were estimated with weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals (PI) by using random‐effects network meta‐analysis. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Twenty‐two studies were included. Significantly greater PPD reduction was achieved in chlorhexidine chip group (WMD: 0.65mm, 95% CI: 0.21–1.10) and tetracycline fiber group (WMD: 0.64 mm, 95% CI: 0.20–1.08) over 6‐month follow‐up. Other adjunctive antimicrobial agents achieved non‐significant improvements compared to scaling and root planing alone. All differences between adjunctive therapies were statistically non‐significant. Similar findings were observed for CAL gain.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Adjunctive local antimicrobial agents achieved small additional PPD reduction and CAL gain in residual pockets for a follow‐up of up to 6 months. Tetracycline fiber and chlorhexidine chip achieved better results than other antimicrobials.</p></section>
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?