Abstract:This survey article assesses and compares existing critiques of current fairness-enhancing technical interventions into machine learning (ML) that draw from a range of non-computing disciplines, including philosophy, feminist studies, critical race and ethnic studies, legal studies, anthropology, and science and technology studies. It bridges epistemic divides in order to offer an interdisciplinary understanding of the possibilities and limits of hegemonic computational approaches to ML fairness for producing just outcomes for society's most marginalized. The article is organized according to nine major themes of critique wherein these different fields intersect: 1) how "fairness" in AI fairness research gets defined; 2) how problems for AI systems to address get formulated; 3) the impacts of abstraction on how AI tools function and its propensity to lead to technological solutionism; 4) how racial classification operates within AI fairness research; 5) the use of AI fairness measures to avoid regulation and engage in ethics washing; 6) an absence of participatory design and democratic deliberation in AI fairness considerations; 7) data collection practices that entrench "bias," are non-consensual, and lack transparency; 8) the predatory inclusion of marginalized groups into AI systems; and 9) a lack of engagement with AI's long-term social and ethical outcomes. Drawing from these critiques, the article concludes by imagining future ML fairness research directions that actively disrupt entrenched power dynamics and structural injustices in society.

The Myth of Complete AI-Fairness

Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness

What About Applied Fairness?

AI Fairness: from Principles to Practice

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

The Man Behind the Curtain: Appropriating Fairness in AI

What Is Fairness? On the Role of Protected Attributes and Fictitious Worlds

Beyond Fairness: Alternative Moral Dimensions for Assessing Algorithms and Designing Systems

Fairness Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: A Review and Path Forward

Providing a Philosophical Critique and Guidance of Fairness Metrics

Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society

Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches

A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AI

Prompting Fairness: Artificial Intelligence as Game Players

Beyond Fairness Metrics: Roadblocks and Challenges for Ethical AI in Practice

Bridging the Gap: the case for an Incompletely Theorized Agreement on AI policy

(Unfair) Norms in Fairness Research: A Meta-Analysis

Rethinking Fairness for Human-AI Collaboration

Toward an Ethics of AI Belief

Explaining how your AI system is fair

Relational Artificial Intelligence