Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness

Maarten Buyl,Tijl De Bie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3624700

IF: 22.7

2024-01-26

Communications of the ACM

Abstract:AI fairness should not be considered a panacea: It may have the potential to make society more fair than ever, but it needs critical thought and outside help to make it happen.

computer science, theory & methods, software engineering, hardware & architecture

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the potential and limitations of technical AI fairness methods in truly achieving fairness in practical applications. The authors point out that although methods to measure and mitigate algorithmic discrimination through mathematical formalization are theoretically appealing, there are eight inherent limitations that hinder their ability to truly address discrimination issues in practice. These limitations include:

1. **Lack of Real-World Context**: Biases in datasets can lead to incorrect estimations of real-world situations, thereby affecting the evaluation of algorithm performance and fairness.
2. **Group Classification**: Measuring fairness by categorizing individuals into different groups can lead to information loss, as illustrated by Simpson's paradox.
3. **Need for Sensitive Data**: Many fairness definitions require sensitive personal data, which conflicts with privacy protection principles.
4. **No Universal Definition of Fairness**: The definition of fairness varies across different contexts, and many definitions are mathematically contradictory.
5. **Risk of Misuse**: Technical fairness methods can be misused to hide certain forms of discrimination by selecting specific proxy labels or group classifications.
6. **Limited Control Over the Entire Decision-Making Process**: AI systems are only part of a larger decision-making process, where biases may originate from interactions with human decision-makers and the environment.
7. **Lack of Portability**: Fairness solutions are highly context-dependent and difficult to transfer across different settings.
8. **Blind Spots**: Unknown biases are difficult to foresee and measure, necessitating continuous analysis and critique.

The paper emphasizes that while technical AI fairness methods have their value, they should not be seen as a panacea for solving fairness issues. Achieving true fairness requires a comprehensive consideration of technical, socio-technical, legal, and other factors, along with non-technical supplementary measures.