Abstract:With the development of digital technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning, many organizations try to introduce AI algorithms into the decision-making process to avoid the subjective inherent biases. Although AI algorithms improve the scientificity of decision-making, they also raise the issue of fairness in the decision-making process. Considering that employees are the direct subject of HR decision-making, how employees view and evaluate the fairness of AI algorithmic decision-making process is very important. However, researches on the above questions are rather limited.Based on the procedural fairness theory, this study discusses the impact of different decision-making subjects (AI algorithms vs. supervisors) on employees’ perception of fairness in the HR decision-making process. Through two experiments, we find that: (1) The decision-making of AI algorithms makes employees have a lower perception of procedural fairness than that of supervisors. (2) Information transparency mediates the relationship between AI algorithmic decision-making and employees’ perception of procedural fairness. Employees believe that AI algorithmic decision-making has lower information transparency, which in turn produces a lower perception of procedural fairness. (3) Inclusive climate moderates the relationship between AI algorithmic decision-making and employees’ perception of procedural fairness. When employees perceive a high level of organizational inclusive climate, the effect of AI algorithmic decision-making on the perception of program fairness will be weakened.Overall, this study responds to the call for more research that bridges AI algorithmic decision-making and individual perception of procedural fairness by examining information transparency as a mediator and inclusive climate as a moderator in this relationship. The findings not only challenge the existing mainstream view that AI algorithmic decision-making does not exist a lower bias than human decision-making, but also offer useful advice to managers and provide implications for organizational HR decision-making practices in the digital and intelligent era.

Fairness Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: A Review and Path Forward

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

AI Fairness: from Principles to Practice

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

Towards Responsible AI: A Design Space Exploration of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence User Interfaces to Investigate Fairness

From Bias to Fairness: A Review of Ethical Considerations and Mitigation Strategies in Artificial Intelligence

The Fairness Fair: Bringing Human Perception into Collective Decision-Making

Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches

Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Fairness: A study to address bias and fairness issues in AI systems, and the ethical implications of AI applications

Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society

Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making

Can AI Algorithmic Decision-making Improve Employees’ Perception of Procedural Fairness?

AI Fairness in Practice

Navigating Fairness: Practitioners' Understanding, Challenges, and Strategies in AI/ML Development

Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction

A Review on Fairness in Machine Learning

The Pursuit of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Models: A Survey

A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AI

Fairness in recommender systems: research landscape and future directions

"The Human Must Remain the Central Focus": Subjective Fairness Perceptions in Automated Decision-Making

(Unfair) Norms in Fairness Research: A Meta-Analysis