Prompting Fairness: Artificial Intelligence as Game Players

Jazmia Henry

2024-02-09

Abstract:Utilitarian games such as dictator games to measure fairness have been studied in the social sciences for decades. These games have given us insight into not only how humans view fairness but also in what conditions the frequency of fairness, altruism and greed increase or decrease. While these games have traditionally been focused on humans, the rise of AI gives us the ability to study how these models play these games. AI is becoming a constant in human interaction and examining how these models portray fairness in game play can give us some insight into how AI makes decisions. Over 101 rounds of the dictator game, I conclude that AI has a strong sense of fairness that is dependant of it it deems the person it is playing with as trustworthy, framing has a strong effect on how much AI gives a recipient when designated the trustee, and there may be evidence that AI experiences inequality aversion just as humans.

Artificial Intelligence,Computer Science and Game Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the behavior of artificial intelligence (AI) in fairness games, especially in the dictator game. The research analyzes the decision-making of AI through 101 rounds of the dictator game to observe whether AI has a sense of fairness and whether its behavior is influenced by contextual factors such as role assignment and the financial situation of the opponent. The experimental results indicate that AI does exhibit some form of aversion to inequality, as it adjusts its fair behavior based on trustworthiness and contextual factors, and may display a fairness sense similar to humans. AI associates trustworthiness with fairness in the game and changes its strategy when facing opponents with different identities and needs. Furthermore, AI's behavior is also influenced by role assignment, such as giving more money when the opponent is described as someone in need of help. However, in the final interview, AI expresses views on ownership of money and fairness that contradict its behavior in the game, suggesting the possibility of complexity in AI's moral reasoning.

In summary, the paper attempts to answer the questions of whether AI has a sense of fairness and whether its decisions are influenced by the game environment and role assignment. The study found that AI does exhibit a certain degree of fairness and aversion to inequality, and is able to adjust its behavior based on the context. However, its moral judgments may differ from those of humans.