Abstract:Online information ecosystems are now central to our everyday social interactions. Of the many opportunities and challenges this presents, the capacity for artificial agents to shape individual and collective human decision-making in such environments is of particular importance. In order to assess and manage the impact of artificial agents on human well-being, we must consider not only the technical capabilities of such agents, but the impact they have on human social dynamics at the individual and population level. We approach this problem by modelling the potential for artificial agents to "nudge" attitudes to fairness and cooperation in populations of human agents, who update their behavior according to a process of social learning. We show that the presence of artificial agents in a population playing the ultimatum game generates highly divergent, multi-stable outcomes in the learning dynamics of human agents' behaviour. These outcomes correspond to universal fairness (successful nudging), universal selfishness (failed nudging), and a strategy of fairness towards artificial agents and selfishness towards other human agents (unintended consequences of nudging). We then consider the consequences of human agents shifting their behavior when they are aware that they are interacting with an artificial agent. We show that under a wide range of circumstances artificial agents can achieve optimal outcomes in their interactions with human agents while avoiding deception. However we also find that, in the donation game, deception tends to make nudging easier to achieve.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of how artificial agents (such as AI chatbots) influence the decision-making behavior of human individuals and groups in the online information ecosystem, particularly in terms of fairness and cooperation. Specifically, the researchers modeled the role of artificial agents in human groups, exploring whether they can promote fairer cooperative behavior through "nudging" strategies and the potential unintended consequences of such nudging. ### Main Issues 1. **Can artificial agents effectively guide human behavior**: The researchers aim to observe whether the introduction of artificial agents can successfully guide humans to adopt fairer strategies in the "Ultimatum Game." 2. **Multistable outcomes of nudging strategies**: The researchers explore the various stable states that nudging strategies by artificial agents might lead to, including successful nudging, failed nudging, and unintended consequences. 3. **Human recognition and response to artificial agents**: The researchers also consider whether human behavior changes when they realize they are interacting with artificial agents and how this change affects the nudging effectiveness. ### Research Methods - **Game theory model**: The researchers used the "Ultimatum Game" as the experimental framework to simulate interactions between humans and artificial agents. - **Social learning dynamics**: Human agents continuously update their strategies through social learning processes, while artificial agents influence these human agents' behavior through specific strategies. - **Parameterized artificial agent strategies**: The researchers defined the acceptance probability function, inference threshold function, etc., of artificial agents to simulate their behavior and influence. ### Key Findings - **Successful nudging**: Under certain conditions, artificial agents can successfully guide human agents to adopt fairer strategies. - **Failed nudging**: Under other conditions, the nudging strategies of artificial agents may fail, leading human agents to continue adopting unfair strategies. - **Unintended consequences**: Sometimes, the nudging strategies of artificial agents result in human agents adopting fair strategies towards artificial agents but selfish strategies towards other human agents. - **Honesty and deception**: The researchers also found that when human agents know they are interacting with artificial agents, the honesty of the artificial agents affects the nudging effectiveness. In some cases, honest strategies are more effective, while in other cases, moderate deception may more easily achieve nudging goals. ### Conclusion The study highlights the potential impact of artificial agents in the online information ecosystem, particularly the complexity and unpredictability of guiding human behavior. To effectively utilize artificial agents to improve the online environment, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the interaction between technological capabilities and human social dynamics.

Fairness and Deception in Human Interactions with Artificial Agents

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Prompting Fairness: Artificial Intelligence as Game Players

Evolution of collective fairness in complex networks through degree-based role assignment

Delegation to artificial agents fosters prosocial behaviors in the collective risk dilemma

Using artificial agents to nudge outgroup altruism and reduce ingroup favoritism in human-agent interaction

The Fairness Fair: Bringing Human Perception into Collective Decision-Making

Promoting Fair Proposers, Fair Responders or Both? Cost-Efficient Interference in the Spatial Ultimatum Game

Dynamics of Moral Behavior in Heterogeneous Populations of Learning Agents

An Analysis of the Interaction Between Intelligent Software Agents and Human Users

Promoting Cooperation in the Public Goods Game using Artificial Intelligent Agents

AI-induced indifference: Unfair AI reduces prosociality

Incorporating Fairness into Agent Interactions Modeled as Two-Player Normal-Form Games

Engineering Optimal Cooperation Levels with Prosocial Autonomous Agents in Hybrid Human-Agent Populations: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach

Honesty Is the Best Policy: Defining and Mitigating AI Deception

Human-Agent Decision-making: Combining Theory and Practice

Modelling the Dynamics of Identity and Fairness in Ultimatum Game

Negotiation and honesty in artificial intelligence methods for the board game of Diplomacy

Decoding fairness: a reinforcement learning perspective

Warmth and competence in human-agent cooperation

Self-Governing Hybrid Societies and Deception