Influence of austenite and martensite strength on martensite morphology

R. G. Davies,C. L. Magee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02913427
1971-07-01
Metallurgical Transactions
Abstract:The martensite morphology and austenite flow strength have been determined in a variety of ferrous alloys chosen so that the austenites were paramagnetic, ferromagnetic, substitutional strengthened, and interstitial strengthened. It is demonstrated that two of the most important variables in determining the habit plane (and thus morphology) of martensite in a given alloy are the resistances to dislocation motion in austenite and in ferrite (i. e., martensite). In the wide variety of alloys where martensite with a {259}γ habit plane was observed, the austenite flow strength atMs is greater than 30,000 psi. At lower austenite strengths, either {225}γ or {111}γ habit planes are found depending on the resistance to dislocation motion in ferrite. Thus, {225} martensites are not always found as part of the spectrum between {111} and {259} martensites but only in the cases (e. g., interstitial strengthening) where ferrite is preferentially strengthened relative to austenite. All of the observations are consistent with the idea that the habit plane observed in a given alloy is the one involving the minimum plastic work for the lattice invariant shear.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?