Abstract:Purpose: The accuracy of dose calculation is the prerequisite for CyberKnife (CK) to implement precise stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). In this study, CK-MLC treatment planning for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were compared using finite-size pencil beam (FSPB) algorithm, FSPB with lateral scaling option (FSPB_LS) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms, respectively. We concentrated on the enhancement of accuracy with the FSPB_LS algorithm over the conventional FSPB algorithm and the dose consistency with the MC algorithm. Methods: In this study, 54 cases of NSCLC were subdivided into central lung cancer (CLC, n=26) and ultra-central lung cancer (UCLC, n=28). For each patient, we used the FSPB algorithm to generate a treatment plan. Then the dose was recalculated using FSPB_LS and MC dose algorithms based on the plans computed using the FSPB algorithm. The resultant plans were assessed by calculating the mean value of pertinent comparative parameters, including PTV prescription isodose, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and dose-volume statistics of organs at risk (OARs). Results: In this study, most dose parameters of PTV and OARs demonstrated a trend of MC > FSPB_LS > FSPB. The FSPB_LS algorithm aligns better with the dose parameters of the target compared to the MC algorithm, which is particularly evident in UCLC. However, the FSPB algorithm significantly underestimated the does of the target. Regarding the OARs in CLC, differences in dose parameters were observed between FSPB and FSPB_LS for V 10 of the contralateral lung, as well as between FSPB and MC for mean dose (D mean ) of the contralateral lung and maximum dose (D max ) of the aorta, exhibiting statistical differences. There were no statistically significant differences observed between FSPB_LS and MC for the OARs. However, the average dose deviation between FSPB_LS and MC algorithms for OARs ranged from 2.79% to 11.93%. No significant dose differences were observed among the three algorithms in UCLC. Conclusion: For CLC, the FSPB_LS algorithm exhibited good consistency with the MC algorithm in PTV and demonstrated a significant improvement in accuracy when compared to the traditional FSPB algorithm. However, the FSPB_LS algorithm and the MC algorithm showed a significant dose deviation in OARs of CLC. In the case of UCLC, FSPB_LS showed better consistency with the MC algorithm than observed in CLC. Notwithstanding, UCLC's OARs were highly sensitive to radiation dose and could result in potentially serious adverse reactions. Consequently, it is advisable to use the MC algorithm for dose calculation in both CLC and UCLC, while the application of FSPB_LS algorithm should be carefully considered.

Comparative analysis of delivered and planned doses in target volumes for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Comparative analysis of dose calculation algorithms for CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiotherapy in lung cancer

Dosimetric Comparison of 192ir Sources Stereotactic Ablative Brachytherapy by Coplanar Template Assisted CT Guidance and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer

Large Pleural Metastases With Significant Inter-fractional Volume Reduction During Online Adaptive Radiotherapy: A Case Report With Dosimetry Comparison

Accumulation of the delivered dose based on cone-beam CT and deformable image registration for non-small cell lung cancer treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy

Difference in target dose distributions between Acuros XB and collapsed cone convolution/superposition and the impact of the tumor locations in clinical cases of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for lung cancer

Clinical Evaluation Of Rtog 0813 Dosimetric Criteria For Lung Sabr Using Iplan Monte Carlo Algorithm

Beyond conventional bounds: Surpassing system limits for stereotactic ablative (SAbR) lung radiotherapy using CBCT‐based adaptive planning system

Evaluation of dose delivery based on deformed CT using a commercial software for lung cancer

A dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and dynamic conformal arc therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer using stereotactic body radiotherapy

Adaptive carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: Organ‐sparing potential and target coverage

Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT

Planning Analysis for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: Dosimetric and Efficiency Comparisons Between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (imrt), Single-Arc/Partial-Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (Sa/pa-Vmat)

Comprehensive dosimetric planning comparison for early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer with SABR: fixed-beam IMRT versus VMAT versus TomoTherapy

Dosimetric Comparison of CT-guided Iodine-125 Seed Stereotactic Brachytherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of NSCLC

Estimation of the Effect of Target and Normal Tissue Sparing Based on Equivalent Uniform Dose-Based Optimization in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

Forecasting patient-specific dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer

Evaluating the Necessity of Adaptive RT and the Role of Deformable Image Registration in Lung Cancer with Different Pathologic Classifications

Dosimetric comparison of gamma knife and linear accelerator (VMAT and IMRT) plans of SBRT of Lung tumours

Optimizing target and diaphragmatic configuration, and dosimetric benefits using continuous positive airway pressure in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung tumors.

Dosimetric benefits of adaptive radiation therapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer