Abstract:OBJECTIVE:We compared the dosimetric differences between the target and surrounding tissues/organs of the 5-field and 7,9-field (Hereinafter referred to as F5, F7, F9) treatment plan in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by the dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (dIMRT), to provide reference for clinical application.METHODS:Using Varian planning system (Eclipse 7.3), we randomly selected 30 cases of patients who received dIMRT to study, all patients were 5, 7, 9 fixed field dynamics intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans to meet the target prescription requirements (95% dose curve enveloping 100% of the PTV), by comparing dose-volume histogram DVH evaluation, and the maximum dose D(max), the minimum dose D(min), and the mean dose D(mean), and conformal index CI of PTV,organs at risk of spinal cord the maximum dose D(max), lung V(5), V(10), V(20), V(30), heart V(30) and esophageal V(50), V(60) of F5,F7 and F9 dIMRT plans,and compare the mu of the three treatment programs.RESULT:The D(max), D(min) and D(mean) values of F5's PTV are (7 203 ± 128), (5 493 ± 331), (6 900 ± 138) cGy respectively; the D(max), D(min) and D(mean) values of F7's PTV are (7 304 ± 96), (5 526 ± 296), (6 976 ± 130) cGy respectively; and the D(max), D(min) and D(mean) values of F9's PTV are (7 356 ± 54), (5 578 ± 287), (7 019 ± 56) cGy respectively. The data shows that while we increased the numbers of fields, the isodose line surrounding the target area would also promote slightly. The conformity index CI of target became better with the increase of radiation fields. The whole lung V(5) and V(10) slightly became larger with increase of fields and the V(20) showed no significant difference in three models, V(30) of double lungs slightly decreased with the increase of fields. The above date was statistically meaningless (P > 0.05). With the increase of fields esophagus V(50) were reduced by 3% and 5% respectively, V(60) of the esophagus were reduced by 6% and 11%, the average dose reduced by 5% and 10% and spinal cord D(max) decreased by 9% and 13%. In the F7 and F9, heart V5 were lower than F5 plan by 11%, 19%. The mu of them were increased with the increase of radiation fields, Treatment time of F7 and F9 plan were longer by 15% and 25%.CONCLUSION:Through comparing the three fixed dIMRT plans, we could draw a conclusion that the three multi-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer can meet the clinical target volume dose requirements. If the treatment is required to protect the patient's spinal cord, esophagus and heart, we can choose 7 or 9 fields. While other ordinary patients should be treated with 5 fields plan, to shorten the treatment time and improve the biological effects of lesions, and lower mu of plans to avoid unnecessary irradiation of normal tissues.

Estimation of the Effect of Target and Normal Tissue Sparing Based on Equivalent Uniform Dose-Based Optimization in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

Dosimetry Study of Fourtypes of Radiotherapy Plan Optimization Methods in the Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

Volumetric and Dosimetric Variations in Radiation Treatment Planning Using CT Images Based on Different Reconstructed Field-of-view

Dosimetric Differences Between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Based on Equivalent Uniform Dose and Dose-Volume Optimization in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Influence of target dose heterogeneity on dose sparing of normal tissue in peripheral lung tumor stereotactic body radiation therapy

Comparison of the Effects of Two Types of Multileaf Collimators on Tumor Control Probability in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer after Conservative Surgery Based on the EUD Model ⁎

Determining the Optimal Dose Prescription for the Planning Target Volume with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

SU-F-T-187: Quantifying Normal Tissue Sparing with 4D Robust Optimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy

Dosimetric Evaluation of Different IMRT Treatment Plans for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study for dosimetry influence of heterogeneous structure in lung cancer radiotherapy

Application of Biological Optimization of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Post Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer

Application of generalized equivalent uniform dose optimization in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Dosimetric Consequences of Tumor Volume Changes after Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Non-Operative Lung Cancer During Adaptive Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy or Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy

SU-GG-T-482: Effects of Normal Lung Delineation Using PTV Vs. GTV On NTCP and Vx for Lung Cancer Cases Planned with and Without Tissue Inhomogeneity Correction

Optimum Treatment Mode Applied to Post-Operative Cervical Cancer for 5F-Imrt Plan Based on Four Variables in Varian Eclipse Tps

[Dosimetric Comparison of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment with Multi Fields Dynamic-Mlc IMRT].

Effect of Normal Lung Definition on Lung Dosimetry and Lung Toxicity Prediction in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning

Comparative analysis of dose calculation algorithms for CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiotherapy in lung cancer

Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Conventional Linac-based X-knife Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Lung Cancer or Pulmonary Metastases

Dosimetric Effect of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Postoperative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with and Without Air Cavity in the Planning Target Volume.

Pre-clinical Study of Reducing the Low-Dose-area of Tomotherapy on Lung Cancer Planning