The potential of integrating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy techniques with hyperfractionation for lung cancer

Chi‐Chuan Chiou,Yuan‐Hung Wu,Pin‐I Huang,Keng‐Li Lan,Yi‐Wei Chen,Yu‐Mei Kang,Lin‐Shan Chou,Yu‐Wen Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15335
IF: 3.223
2024-06-19
Thoracic Cancer
Abstract:A simple formula to determine the transition point was found. The hypofractionated regimen is superior below this point but inferior above it compared with the hyperfractionated regimen using SABR techniques. In addition, the hyperfractionated regimens appear to be superior to the hypofractionated regimen when comparing LKB model‐estimated NTCP with mean lung BED. Conversely, hypofractionated regimens seem to be better when focusing on critical volume or V20. Background Limited literature exists on the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) techniques with hyperfractionated regimens for patients with lung cancer. This study aims to assess whether the SABR technique with hyperfractionation can potentially reduce lung toxicity. Methods We utilized the linear‐quadratic model to find the optimal fraction to maximize the tumor biological equivalent dose (BED) to normal‐tissue BED ratio. Validation was performed by comparing the SABR plans with 50 Gy/5 fractions and hyperfractionationed plans with 88.8 Gy/74 fractions with the same tumor BED and planning criteria for 10 patients with early‐stage lung cancer. Mean lung BED, Lyman–Kutcher–Burman (LKB) normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), critical volume (CV) criteria (volume below BED of 22.92 and 25.65 Gy, and mean BED for lowest 1000 and 1500 cc) and the percentage of the lung receiving 20Gy or more (V20) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results The transition point occurs when the tumor‐to‐normal tissue ratio (TNR) of the physical dose equals the TNR of α/β in the BED dose‐volume histogram of the lung. Compared with the hypofractionated regimen, the hyperfractionated regimen is superior in the dose range above but inferior below the transition point. The hyperfractionated regimen showed a lower mean lung BED (6.40 Gy vs. 7.73 Gy) and NTCP (3.50% vs. 4.21%), with inferior results concerning CV criteria and higher V20 (7.37% vs. 7.03%) in comparison with the hypofractionated regimen (p
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?