Abstract:Background: Throughout a patient's course of radiation therapy, maintaining accuracy of their initial treatment plan over time is challenging due to anatomical changes-for example, stemming from patient weight loss or tumor shrinkage. Online adaptation of their RT plan to these changes is crucial, but hindered by manual and time-consuming processes. While deep learning (DL) based solutions have shown promise in streamlining adaptive radiation therapy (ART) workflows, they often require large and extensive datasets to train population-based models. Purpose: This study extends our prior research by introducing a minimalist approach to patient-specific adaptive dose prediction. In contrast to our prior method, which involved fine-tuning a pre-trained population model, this new method trains a model from scratch using only a patient's initial treatment data. This patient-specific dose predictor aims to enhance clinical accessibility, thereby empowering physicians and treatment planners to make more informed, quantitative decisions in ART. We hypothesize that patient-specific DL models will provide more accurate adaptive dose predictions for their respective patients compared to a population-based DL model. Methods: We selected 33 patients to train an adaptive population-based (AP) model. Ten additional patients were selected, and their respective initial RT data served as single samples for training patient-specific (PS) models. These 10 patients contained an additional 26 ART plans that were withheld as the test dataset to evaluate AP versus PS model dose prediction performance. We assessed model performance using Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) by comparing predicted doses to the originally delivered ground truth doses. We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine statistically significant differences in terms of MAPE between the AP and PS model results across the test dataset. Furthermore, we calculated differences between predicted and ground truth mean doses for segmented structures and determined statistical significance in the differences for each of them. Results: The average MAPE across AP and PS model dose predictions was 5.759% and 4.069%, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test yielded two-tailed p-value = 2.9802 × 10 - 8 $2.9802\ \times \ {10}^{ - 8}$ , indicating that the MAPE differences between the AP and PS model dose predictions are statistically significant, and 95% confidence interval = [-2.1610, -1.0130], indicating 95% confidence that the MAPE difference between the AP and PS models for a population lies in this range. Out of 24 total segmented structures, the comparison of mean dose differences for 12 structures indicated statistical significance with two-tailed p-values < 0.05. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the potential of patient-specific deep learning models in application to ART. Notably, our method streamlines the training process by minimizing the size of the required training dataset, as only a single patient's initial treatment data is required. External institutions considering the implementation of such a technology could package such a model so that it only requires the upload of a reference treatment plan for model training and deployment. Our single patient learning strategy demonstrates promise in ART due to its minimal dataset requirement and its utility in personalization of cancer treatment.

Forecasting patient-specific dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer

Forecasting per-patient dosimetric benefit from daily online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer

Dosimetric Analysis of Radiation Treatment Plans Based on a Deep Learning Auto Contouring Model for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

Unlocking the adaptive advantage: correlation and machine learning classification to identify optimal online adaptive stereotactic partial breast candidates

A Prediction Model for Dosimetric-Based Lung Adaptive Radiotherapy

In silico evaluation and feasibility of near margin-less head and neck daily adaptive radiotherapy

Daily Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Postoperative Endometrial and Cervical Cancer With PTV Margin Reduction to 5 mm: Dosimetric Outcomes, Acute Toxicity, and First Clinical Experience

A method for predictive modeling of tumor regression for lung adaptive radiotherapy

The Current use of Adaptive Strategies for External Beam Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review

Large Pleural Metastases With Significant Inter-fractional Volume Reduction During Online Adaptive Radiotherapy: A Case Report With Dosimetry Comparison

Single patient learning for adaptive radiotherapy dose prediction

A feasibility study of dynamic adaptive radiotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer

A Preliminary Simulation Study of Dose-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy Based on Halcyon MV Cone-Beam CT Images With Retrospective Data From a Phase II Clinical Trial

First implementation and results of online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer based on CT-Linac combination

Enhancing Precision in Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A Case Study of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Based Online Adaptive Techniques and the Promise of HyperSight™ Iterative CBCT

Managing Inconsistent Bladder Volumes in the Prostate Cancer Patient Using Daily Online Adaptive RT: A Case Report

A Personalized Anisotropic Margin for Cervical Cancer Radiation Therapy Under the Guidance of Daily Iterative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (iCBCT)

Quantitative assessment of adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using deep learning: Bladder dose as a decision criterion

Estimating Potential Benefits of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Prospects for daily online adaptive radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Auto-contouring evaluation and dosimetric outcomes

The influence of daily imaging and target margin reduction on secondary cancer risk in image-guided and adaptive proton therapy