Abstract:Background Dysmenorrhea is the most common gynecological condition reported by women, and 33% to 50% of them report moderate to severe symptoms. It is defined by menstrual pain in the pelvic region and lower abdomen that can be associated or not to other secondary gynecological conditions (e.g., endometriosis, myoma, adenomyosis). The symptoms are frequently associated with others and can affect women's quality of life and functioning, such as missing school/university/work, decreased sleep quality and fatigue. Those symptoms can be intensified by emotional stress, lower social support and lower socioeconomic conditions. Given the great interference of dysmenorrhea in various spheres of life, a comprehensive evaluation of disability and functioning is necessary for this population. Objectives To analyze functioning and the affected domains in women with dysmenorrhea. Methods Cross-sectional and online study conducted between 2022 and 2023 with 2,609 Brazilian adult women with dysmenorrhea (27.7 ± 7.4 years old). Pregnant women, with 6 months of puerperium and transgender were excluded. The translated and validated Brazilian Portuguese version of WHODAS-12 for women with dysmenorrhea was used. The WHODAS-12 is an instrument with 12 items developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to briefly assess health and disability and provide the level of general functioning of the following domains: life activities, mobility, cognition, social participation, self-care, and interpersonal relationships. All the items and domains are directly linked to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The maximum score of each domain is 10 points and the higher the score, the greater the disability. Data were analyzed descriptively and presented as the mean and standard deviation in SPSS 22. Results The average of life activities domain was 4.7 ± 1.8 points, the mobility domain had 4.5 ± 2 points, the cognition domain had 4.4 ± 1.8 points, social participation had 4.8 ± 2 points, self-care had 2.6 ± 1.2 points, and interpersonal relationships had 4 ± 1.9 points. Interpersonal relationships and life activities were the most affected domains in women with dysmenorrhea. Conclusion In addition to pain intensity, the WHODAS-12 provided a screening of other domains of functionality that may be affected in women with dysmenorrhea, such as social participation and activities of daily living. Implications From the use of the WHODAS-12, it is possible to evaluate important aspects that are relevant beyond the intensity of pain in women with dysmenorrhea. Thus, clinicians can use WHODAS-12 as a specific and individualized therapeutic goal by approaching the woman from an integrality perspective. In addition, it is also possible to have a broader view of the impact of dysmenorrhea on the quality of life and functioning of Brazilian women.

Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the instrument World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea

Reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0) questionnaire for women with urinary incontinence

Translation and Validation of the Arrhythmia-Specific Questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) to the Brazilian Context: An Instrument Focusing on Arrhythmia Symptoms

USE OF THE WHODAS QUESTIONNAIRE TO SCREEN FOR PHYSICAL INACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH COPD

Validation of tele-assessment of disability and health after stroke using WHODAS 2.0 through video call in a middle-income country

The World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument for people with intellectual and physical disabilities (WHOQOL-Dis): evidence of validity of the Brazilian version

Development and validation of an electronic daily control score for asthma (e-DASTHMA): a real-world direct patient data study

Pediatric Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire for the Brazilian population: Cross‐cultural adaptation and measurement properties

Measuring Disability Across Cultures — the Psychometric Properties of the WHODAS II in Older People from Seven Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries. the 10/66 Dementia Research Group Population‐based Survey

ASSESSING FUNCTIONING BY WHODAS-12 IN WOMEN WITH DYSMENORRHEA

Assessing the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions through the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 on Disability—A Systematic Review

Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses

Londrina Activities of Daily Living Protocol: validity, reliability, minimal detectable change, and standard error of measurement in adults with asthma

Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia

Comparing the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in children and adolescents

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of health and self-management in diabetes questionnaire (HASMID-10) into Brazilian Portuguese

Validation of the adult asthma epidemiological score: a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study

PRELIMINARY CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE BRAZILIAN VERSION OF THE PEDIATRIC RATING OF CHRONIC ILLNESS SELF-EFFICACY (PRCISE)

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders

Validation of Autism Stigma Knowledge - Questionnaire (ASK-Q) for Brazilian Portuguese