Abstract:Background Anxiety is a frequent comorbidity in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and with important repercussions, such as functional impairment, decreased quality of life and adherence to treatment, and increased risk of hospitalization. In this context, the Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Diseases (AIR), the only instrument specifically developed to investigate anxiety symptoms in this population, was cross-culturally adapted for use in Brazil. Still, the measurement properties of the face-to-face version have not yet been investigated. Objectives To investigate the internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability, convergent and divergent validity of the face-to-face AIR in patients with COPD. Methods This is a cross-sectional methodological study. On the first day, after signing the Free and Informed Consent Form, the Mini-Mental State Examination, the sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire were applied, and anthropometric data were collected, followed by spirometry. Subsequently, patients answered the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the AIR, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL). To determine the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the IAR, seven days after the first application of the questionnaire, the leading researcher reapplied the scale with a control form via telephone contact, and a second rater contacted patients 48 hours later. The internal consistency of the AIR was measured using Cronbach's alpha and reliability using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Spearman's correlation test (rho) was used to determine validity (p<0.05). Results Twelve individuals [7 female, age 60.5 (min. 53.7-max.70.8) years] participated in the study; nine were included in the test-retest reliability analyses and eight in the inter-rater reliability. For internal consistency, Cronbach's α was 0.94. For test-retest reliability, the ICC was 0.73; for inter-rater reliability, it was 0.88. Regarding convergent validity, significant correlations of high magnitude were observed between the AIR and the HADS anxiety domain (rho = 0.82), depression domain (rho = 0.87), and the total score (rho = 0.79), and of moderate magnitude between the AIR and the BAI (rho = 0.70). For divergent validity, non-significant correlations of weak magnitude were observed between AIR and LCADL (rho = 0.39), AIR and CAT (rho = 0.10), and AIR and MRC (rho = 0. 17). Conclusion The study's preliminary results indicate that the AIR demonstrates adequate measurement properties for assessing anxiety symptoms in patients with COPD. The study will be continued to expand the sample number. Implications This study will provide a measurement instrument for investigating anxiety symptoms in patients with COPD with appropriate measurement properties, which may facilitate early identification and proper treatment.

Londrina Activities of Daily Living Protocol: validity, reliability, minimal detectable change, and standard error of measurement in adults with asthma

Minimal important difference for London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Reliability and validity of the online application of London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in assessing dyspnea-related functional impairment in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19

ANALYSIS OF ANXIETY INVENTORY SCALE FOR RESPIRATORY DISEASES (RAI) FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE

Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADLI): Proposal of a new instrument and preliminary data

The Manchester Respiratory Activities of Daily Living questionnaire for use in COPD patients: translation into Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil

Activities of daily living and related factors in patients with severe COPD

USE OF THE WHODAS QUESTIONNAIRE TO SCREEN FOR PHYSICAL INACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH COPD

Cardiopulmonary Response in Post-COVID-19 Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing the Londrina Activities of Daily Living Protocol, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Glittre Activities of Daily Living Test

The Dutch functional performance inventory: validity and reliability in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease

Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma

Physical activity, physical capacity and sedentary behavior among asthma patients

Development and validation of an electronic daily control score for asthma (e-DASTHMA): a real-world direct patient data study

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the instrument World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and construct validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale

Asthma Daytime Symptom Diary (ADSD) and Asthma Nighttime Symptom Diary (ANSD): Measurement Properties of Novel Patient-Reported Symptom Measures

Pediatric Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire for the Brazilian population: Cross‐cultural adaptation and measurement properties

PRELIMINARY CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE BRAZILIAN VERSION OF THE PEDIATRIC RATING OF CHRONIC ILLNESS SELF-EFFICACY (PRCISE)

Diaphragmatic mobility: relationship with lung function, respiratory muscle strength, dyspnea, and physical activity in daily life in patients with COPD

Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument in People Living with COPD

Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Patient Activation Measure 13