Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularization

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Adversarial for Good – Defending Training Data Privacy with Adversarial Attack Wisdom

A Method to Facilitate Membership Inference Attacks in Deep Learning Models

Silver Linings in the Shadows: Harnessing Membership Inference for Machine Unlearning

Privacy-Preserving in Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks

Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Models

Membership Inference Defense Algorithm Based on Neural Network Model

Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks: RM Learning is All You Need

Membership Inference via Backdooring

On the Effectiveness of Regularization Against Membership Inference Attacks

Leveraging Adversarial Examples to Quantify Membership Information Leakage

Effectiveness of L2 Regularization in Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning

When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacy

Membership Privacy for Machine Learning Models Through Knowledge Transfer

Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning in the Wild: Membership Inference Attacks against Transfer Learning

Generalization Techniques Empirically Outperform Differential Privacy against Membership Inference

Differentially Private and Adversarially Robust Machine Learning: An Empirical Evaluation

Improved Membership Inference Attacks Against Language Classification Models

A Fine-tuning-based Adversarial Network for Member Privacy Preserving

Regularization Mixup Adversarial Training: A Defense Strategy for Membership Privacy with Model Availability Assurance